Started By
Message
re: 9/11 Was A Conspiracy!
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:03 pm to Rebelgator
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:03 pm to Rebelgator
mizzou seems to have a pretty high ratio of bat shite crazy posters
1
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:07 pm to heartbreakTiger
Look at how crazy this guy is, I bet he keeps his tin foil in his moms basement.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:08 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
jet fuel can't cause steel to melt, and there is melted steel, then there is a red flag.
A) Did they test it and prove it was steel that was molten?
B) The jet fuel burned off very quickly. It was the other materials that fueled the fire. The temperature jet fuel burns at doesn't matter anyway.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:09 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Would you call Mike Leach sane?
I'm a fan, but he thinks he's a goddamn pirate.
I'm a fan, but he thinks he's a goddamn pirate.
This post was edited on 6/25/14 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:09 pm to Duke
quote:
A) Did they test it and prove it was steel that was molten?
It might have been the wooden desks, I'm not sure.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:11 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
Would you call Mike Leach sane?
I've never been a fan, weird dude.
He's in no way as charismatic or successful as Pete.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:13 pm to Sleeping Tiger
So, would you have used a picture of him in the same manor as Carroll? Why not use Vedder?
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:13 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Right, because that's the only other material in the building. Glass melts. Other metals melt. Alloys melt. Polymers melt. Extraordinary claims need evidence to back it up. Where's your proof it was the steel?
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:15 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
So, would you have used a picture of him in the same manor as Carroll? Why not use Vedder?
Is Mike Leach a truther guy?
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:17 pm to Sleeping Tiger
No, the point is you can be successful and still be nuts.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:21 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Anyway, I won't be continuing this, this isn't an issue I'd elect to focus on in an effort to sway people's opinion of the event, there is just too much other good stuff.
For example?
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:27 pm to Duke
No only structural steel and chocolate melts.
Oh and sleeping tiger is one of those lame dick losers that's gonna post like 13 links in a row to try and deflect.
Oh and sleeping tiger is one of those lame dick losers that's gonna post like 13 links in a row to try and deflect.
This post was edited on 6/25/14 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:29 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
If we can determine that jet fuel can't cause steel to melt, and there is melted steel, then there is a red flag.
Yes. It does matter. Because if you can't present an alternate theory which explains stuff, then I dismiss it using Occam's razor.
Poking holes in things isn't a theory. It's just naysaying.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:30 pm to Slippery Slope
I like chocolate melts. Hershey bars are my favorite.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:43 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
For example?
Yeah, let me pour out hours upon hours of research conducted over years in a message board post.
The best way to fast track a better understanding of that day is to watch this documentary.
It's roughly 5 hours long, but its an impressive and pretty fair assessment of the event, it includes the debunking explanations. And I say fast track because this doc just focuses on the events of 911, there's an enormous amount of info that doesn't involve the actual terrorist attacks.
A cool feature to this site is the way they've cataloged the material. You can jump to a particular topic by looking at what time it starts. 47:00 minutes of part 3 is where the issue of molten steel is discussed.
I'll say I think most Americans can benefit from learning more about 911, most don't really know too much about it, yet most hold really firm beliefs on what happened that day (both truthers and normal people). Regardless of whether you care to entertain the idea that the official story is false it would be good if people were more informed on the topic.
This post was edited on 6/25/14 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:45 pm to the808bass
quote:
Yes. It does matter. Because if you can't present an alternate theory which explains stuff, then I dismiss it using Occam's razor.
Poking holes in things isn't a theory. It's just naysaying.
There is a theory, or evidence (however you want to see it) on what caused the molten metal.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 10:02 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Even 6 weeks after.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 10:08 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Look at how crazy this guy is, I bet he keeps his tin foil in his moms basement.
Why is Pete Carroll's opinion on this matter any more relevant than anyone else's?
Plenty of wildly successful people hold illogical views or are bat shite crazy.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 10:12 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Seriously though how many NSA lists do you think you're on?
Posted on 6/25/14 at 10:16 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Even 6 weeks after.
LOL
I mean, man, it's not like in question.
There was indeed molten steel at ground zero 6 weeks after (and apparently beyond) 911.
Page 6 of 48
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News