Rooster tell us

Roper is handcuffed by a shitty OLine

Roper is more handcuffed by his Forrest Gump intellect and his autistic-like obsession with running certain plays over and over again in a single game than anything else, and Duncechamp's ultra-conservative mindset (his full retard fake punt playcall notwithstanding) certainly doesn't help.

Elliott is a cheerleading coach, and has never been much more than that and he should have been fired years ago. No sane person can disagree with that.

Alright so here is what I've been told this afternoon.

mUSChamp, when you are on his shite list, he ignores you and passes you giving you dirty looks.

I heard that's happening with a couple of people this morning during and after the meeting and before everyone took off to do "damage control" (sic) on the recruiting trail.

I kinda get the feeling that Elliott may be feeling some heat. Evidently something blew up about his sideline demeanor, or lack of coaching, last night.

quote:

---

There isn't any way on God's green earth that Elliott isn't if Muschamp has any fighting/winning spirit in his body.

---

After enduring years of Spurrier's apathetic attitude towards glaring coaching issues, I might lose it if Muschamp doesn't do anything to get rid of Elliott this off-season.

There are several ways this could go down.

1 - Elliott could get a HC job at a small school somewhere, but if that's going to happen it will happen fairly soon.

2 - Muschamp let's everyone with one year contracts know that renewal time is coming ... and in the process he implies to one or two that they should give things a second thought, about what they want to do with their lives.

3 - Muschamp retains Elliott for another year for recruiting purposes ... but he lets it be known that there has to be massive improvement shown along the OLine.

4 - Muschamp waits until after recruiting season is over then accepts a resignation or two (while already having someone else ready to step into that/those positions).

If a move is going to be made, if someone is going to lose their job, then who or where they are recruiting will not matter. It never does. For instance, if Elliott were to be fired and he had a critical recruit or two on his board then Muschamp and other coaches would swoop in and cover that immediately ... and resell the school and the head coach and the incoming coach ... not the fired assistant coach.

Something very similar went down with McIlwain last year. GA Mangus was visiting with McIlwain very late in the process. Spurrier, Jr was doing similar things ... and we still kept almost everybody. We lost a couple of Whammy's guys I think.

final tally on 2016 for the USC OL;

Sacks allowed = 36 (T-115/128)
Sacks/SEC play = 31 (14/14)

Tackles for loss = 92 (120/128)
TFL/SEC play = 72 (14/14)

2016 v 2015
Sacks: 36 v 26
SEC: 31 v 20

TFL: 92 v 69
SEC: 72 v 48

** our obvious snap count no doubt contributed to these results this season, as well as the clear issues with the OL.

Damn, we were worse than I thought.

Elliott would make a hell of a cheerleader coach at 1/20th of his current salary. Hopefully Tanner hooks him up with the job in another 5 years when he and Duncechamp are done running our program into the ground.

Probably not, I'll let you guys circlejerk into oblivion about how Wreal Duncechamp is the best hire we've ever made, much like Florida did prior to Charlie Strong owning him the Sugar Bowl. It was only downhill from there, only this time the win vs. one of the most overrated teams of all time in Tennessee is our downhill marker. The Clemson game was just an exclamation point, much like Duncechamp's loss to Georgia Southern. Many D-II coaches would have coached our team better this year, only they're not part of the good ole boy fraternity of the SEC.