Started By
Message
La Tech: Well coached and executed plan well
Posted on 9/28/14 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 9/28/14 at 5:20 pm
My hats off to the La Tech players and coaches.
We have better athletes. Bray's punt return and scramble jump ball along with Duke's catch were 3 plays where the SEC athlete was just bigger, stronger, and faster than the La Tech man.
But La Tech was not busting coverages and gaps were contained by their defense.
La Tech did a good job putting safeties over Duke and/or Sammie. Their DBs stayed in coverage when NM pressed the edge and did not give up the easy TD toss (aka, the Sammie TD versus Bama or Seahawk NFL play)
On offense, their QB was shorter than most so tipped balls were an issue. He could get it out quick and his WRs caught most of his good passes.
Gus made a good play call on the Bray TD right before the half.
We have better athletes. Bray's punt return and scramble jump ball along with Duke's catch were 3 plays where the SEC athlete was just bigger, stronger, and faster than the La Tech man.
But La Tech was not busting coverages and gaps were contained by their defense.
La Tech did a good job putting safeties over Duke and/or Sammie. Their DBs stayed in coverage when NM pressed the edge and did not give up the easy TD toss (aka, the Sammie TD versus Bama or Seahawk NFL play)
On offense, their QB was shorter than most so tipped balls were an issue. He could get it out quick and his WRs caught most of his good passes.
Gus made a good play call on the Bray TD right before the half.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 6:30 pm to Lee County Tiger
Does anyone know any Oklahoma fans and have gotten his/her take away from when they played LA Tech? Do you think they have them as much as a headache they gave us?
Posted on 9/28/14 at 6:37 pm to Rig
quote:
LaTech is terrible
They lack talent, but their effort was good.
Their guys are just smaller, slower, weaker.
I thought they played about as well as the talent differential allowed.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 6:47 pm to AUNashville
Well if this tells you anything:
1st Qtr OU 21 Lt 0
2nd Qtr OU 31 Lt 3
3rd Qtr OU 41 Lt 3
4th Qtr OU 48 Lt 16
1st Qtr Au 7 Lt 0
2nd Qtr Au 24 Lt 3
3rd Qtr Au 24 Lt 10
4th Qtr Au 45 Lt 17
1st Qtr OU 21 Lt 0
2nd Qtr OU 31 Lt 3
3rd Qtr OU 41 Lt 3
4th Qtr OU 48 Lt 16
1st Qtr Au 7 Lt 0
2nd Qtr Au 24 Lt 3
3rd Qtr Au 24 Lt 10
4th Qtr Au 45 Lt 17
This post was edited on 9/28/14 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:01 pm to makersmark1
No amount of spinning will make our OL performance acceptable.
Posted on 9/28/14 at 10:51 pm to makersmark1
Why can't our secondary cover a single white receiver? That's 2 games in a row that we've been torched by a slow white kid.
:inbeforeracist:
:inbeforeracist:
Posted on 9/28/14 at 11:07 pm to ever43
quote:
No amount of spinning will make our OL performance acceptable.
Nope. We should have road graded them all day.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 5:21 am to ever43
quote:
No amount of spinning will make our OL performance acceptable.
Agree. The line got whipped by smaller, slower guys.
I was attempting to give La Tech some credit for effort and execution.
Posted on 9/29/14 at 8:36 am to makersmark1
Should have beat them 60-0
Posted on 9/29/14 at 9:09 am to DecaturAU
quote:Averaged 10 yards a catch (season low) and no TDs.
Why can't our secondary cover a single white receiver? That's 2 games in a row that we've been torched by a slow white kid.
absolutely torched us
This post was edited on 9/29/14 at 9:12 am
Posted on 9/29/14 at 9:13 am to joeyb147
It's just cause he's white.
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News