Started By
Message
re: Why is Bama and Auburn hardley ever that good in basketball?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:41 pm to sportsfreak1989s
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:41 pm to sportsfreak1989s
quote:
I think you are incorrect. Unless you are counting your game against UF, that is going on right now, as a win. Then you would be tied with Arkansas.
Is that an updated list?
Maybe the list I looked at hasn't been updated to include this season's totals? IDK.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:43 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
When bama fans claim they are second in wins, that is also just limited to the original 10 teams. Arkansas definitely has more wins all time and Missouri might as well
Arkansas just passed Alabama this year in all-time wins. But Alabama certainly is second in conference wins in the SEC.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:43 pm to Tuscaloosa
You may have clicked on the conference list where it doesn't count Arkansas' SWC wins/losses
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:44 pm to Tuscaloosa
unless that list is updated to the second, what I said is still true given that Arkansas has more than 3 more wins this year
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:45 pm to Bootycall
quote:
Why is Bama and Auburn hardley ever that good in basketball?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:47 pm to Rhymenoceros
quote:
Both programs are historically average in the league,
Not true. Bama was a distant 2nd to UK until the last decade or so.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:48 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
unless that list is updated to the second, what I said is still true given Arkansas has more than 3more wins this year
Perhaps, but even you can admit that the premise and tone of your post is way off, no?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:55 pm to Tuscaloosa
I just remember seeing an all time list where Arkansas was well ahead of bama, but I now believe that might have been in winning percentage. They were ahead in that category even before this year.
Alabama has played basketball 10 years longer, so Arkansas has to be significantly abead in winning percentage for them to be tied in number of wins
Alabama has played basketball 10 years longer, so Arkansas has to be significantly abead in winning percentage for them to be tied in number of wins
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:57 pm to auburnphan23
I truly believe you get an SECRant alert that sends you this when Bama is the subject.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:58 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
I truly don't give a shite what you believe
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:58 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Alabama has played basketball 10 years longer, so Arkansas has to be significantly abead in winning percentage for them to be tied in number of wins
To be fair, since you included in Mizzou in your previous post, too - we're ahead of Mizzou in all-time wins, and they've also played for 7 more seasons than Bama.
In reference to win percentage, going into this season Arkansas was at .639 and Bama was at .620.
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 2:14 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
under Wimp Alabama was a tournament team, then under Gottfried we were up and down
Alabama has had success in basketball
the entire state just seems to be down now
Alabama has had success in basketball
the entire state just seems to be down now
Posted on 3/12/15 at 8:01 pm to Bootycall
Maybe I shouldn't have started this thread. Auburn might be dancing.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 8:18 pm to Bootycall
Why are your grammar so bad?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 8:22 pm to Bootycall
quote:
Auburn might be dancing.
They'd have to win the tournament.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 8:25 pm to Bootycall
This dumbass still hasn't figured out how to spell hardly?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News