Started By
Message
re: Reports out that Clem players’ “B” sample also positive for PEDs.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:20 pm to Lonnie Utah
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:20 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Dude. It doesn't matter WHEN they took it. It was in their system.
Dude you were arguing about half life and saying they had to take it very recently. I said if it's a tiny trace, it could have been taken/exposed months ago.
I am not arguing he is not guilty of having it in his system. I am saying based on past history of no PED use despite being tested over the past several years in the playoff and by Clemson, it is plausible that it was exposure via contamination and not as part of some grand steroid scheme. Exposure via contamination has happened recently with a triathlete.
3
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:26 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
Dude you were arguing about half life and saying they had to take it very recently. I said if it's a tiny trace, it could have been taken/exposed months ago.
You need to brush up on your human physiology. With a half life of less than a day (hours) any trace of it will be totally out of the in less than 48 hours.
To me if the case you're is reality it's a worse scenario for Clemson. Wait til the NCAA says Clemson has to start vacating wins....
Posted on 12/28/18 at 6:22 am to CivilTiger83
quote:
I am not arguing he is not guilty of having it in his system. I am saying based on past history of no PED use despite being tested over the past several years in the playoff and by Clemson, it is plausible that it was exposure via contamination and not as part of some grand steroid scheme. Exposure via contamination has happened recently with a triathlete.
We all know exactly what happened.
You do, too.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 6:46 am to CivilTiger83
quote:
I am not arguing he is not guilty of having it in his system. I am saying based on past history of no PED use despite being tested over the past several years in the playoff and by Clemson, it is plausible that it was exposure via contamination and not as part of some grand steroid scheme. Exposure via contamination has happened recently with a triathlete.
This isn't the best example to use. 1) It was never proven that salt tablets were the source of the banned aubstance. That was just a theory floated by the athlete. 2) The athlete still accepted a 6 month ban from sport for failing the test.
Given what I posted above about how one can beat dope testing by microdosing and timing, it doesn't look good for Clemson.
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 6:48 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News