Started By
Message

re: Eason will start vs Vandy?

Posted on 10/5/17 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58962 posts
Posted on 10/5/17 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

We can clearly see how far back that safety is, and he isn't close enough to defend that pass.


yes he was. he was close enough to come close to the pick, and he wouldn't have just stood there, he would have come forward....or if he played his position correctly he would have come forward.

quote:

After the catch, It would have been a 1 on 1 inside the 10. Who you gonna bet on there?


Not one on one, it would have been two on one. theguy that was initially covering Nauta would have stuck with him, too, because there was nobody else in the backfield.
You seem to want to believe things but your assumptions are incorrect, if they play their positions correctly and as they should. There are no guarantees that they would have, but I can assure you Nauta was not going to come open. nauta was tightly covered when the ball was thrown, and he should have been covered all the way through his route.....UNLESS the safety dropped Nauta and went to Michel to give over the top help. But the fact that he had a shot at a pick tells me he was aware of what was happening and stayed where he was supposed to be.

Again...I really get tired of arguing these type points, because in order for me to be correct I have to assume things that I don't have any way of knowing, and you do, too. What we can see on the playback is that Michel was wide open and the ball was thrown to Nauta.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41826 posts
Posted on 10/5/17 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Again...I really get tired of arguing these type points, because in order for me to be correct I have to assume things that I don't have any way of knowing, and you do, too. What we can see on the playback is that Michel was wide open and the ball was thrown to Nauta.
You can also see a glaring hole in the defense where the ball was placed and where Nauta appeared to be headed prior to falling down.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33107 posts
Posted on 10/5/17 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

he was close enough to come close to the pick, and he wouldn't have just stood there, he would have come forward....or if he played his position correctly he would have come forward.


He did come forward, but when you are far back like he was, how far you can come is limited. If he was in position to defend that pass, he would not have had to dive forward to the ground just to get to the ball at the 4 yard line as he did.

quote:

it would have been two on one. theguy that was initially covering Nauta would have stuck with him, too, because there was nobody else in the backfield.


If you look closely, this guy was facing Sony, thus would not have been in position to defend the pass where the route was heading. He have been left in the dust due to being distracted by Sony.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter