Started By
Message
re: The main reason I love Trump more today than a few weeks ago
Posted on 2/25/17 at 11:57 am to TeLeFaWx
Posted on 2/25/17 at 11:57 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
You poison every thread you're in with your SJW bull shite. Stop i
by poison, I say things that you don't like and you want to shut me up. that's the definition of SJW which you are.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 11:57 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
You poison every thread you're in with your SJW bull shite. Stop i
by poison, I say things that you don't like and you want to shut me up. that's the definition of SJW which you are. you want to regulate speech.
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 11:59 am
Posted on 2/25/17 at 11:57 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
You poison every thread you're in with your SJW bull shite. Stop i
by poison, I say things that you don't like and you want to shut me up. that's the definition of SJW which you are.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 12:00 pm to cas4t
quote:
You're part of the problem
And you honestly thought Trump would win because you thought people wanted Trump more than Hillary, not because you thought Hillary would ignore the wrong states
you thought Hillary would win the EC in a blowout. i never thought about national popular vote b/c our system isn't based on the national popular vote. my projection of trump wins was based on states that I thought he would win.
hillary got a lot of illegal immigrant votes especially in California. i question that she won the legit national popular vote. obviously illegals and criminals hate Trump.
moreover, Trump would have increased his national popular vote if he ran a campaign based on winning the national popular vote. he never campaigned or ran ads in NY and CA and some other populated states. winning elections is partly about strategy. his strategy was based on the rules of the game and he won big league in the EC.
i thinik anybody who opposes leftwingers like you is part of the solution. anybody who thinks HIllary clinton was a btter option than Trump is 'literally retarded'. th4 woman made up a story about her helicopter taking sniper fire in Bosnia.
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 2/25/17 at 12:16 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
now. Never said I was. You can vote for someone and not be a member of their party. But I do agree with a lot of libertarian ideals.
you must be trying to spin support for things like abortion and allowing men into female restrooms as libertarian. bill maher calls himself a libertarian too but he's a big government liberal.
i don't a person who supports giving money to PP is a small government person.
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 2/25/17 at 12:23 pm to Tillman
Bloody hell you are an incorrigible idiot when it comes to political threads.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 12:25 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Bloody hell you are an incorrigible idiot when it comes to political threads.
why do you feel the need to always say this to me? why not express your own political opinions without lecturing me.
when you do talk about politics, it is so dull b/c it is mostly you whining about the 'two party' system, even though there are multiple political parties. it is not Democrat or GOP fault the other parties can't attract more voters.
i would say Trump represents a new viable 3rd party, because he attracted a lot of Democrats but you complaining about two party system. basically the Reform party won the election.
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 2/25/17 at 12:42 pm to Tillman
quote:
why not express your own political opinions without lecturing me.
I was doing exactly that itt before your dumbass showed up and turned the thread into complete shite. Per par for you.
quote:
when you do talk about politics, it is so dull b/c it is mostly you whining about the 'two party' system
This right here indicates that you hardly read any of my political posts.
Two parties have a stranglehold on American politics. It is what it is, but it's naive to assume that a country if diverse political opinions can have them all neatly fit into one of two boxes.
I'm a registered Republican in my state. I realize I play into the game, too. Just pointing out that it's inherently flawed no matter what type of person conveniently runs under either umbrella. It's an observation.
But that's hardly the bulk of my posting about politics. Conversely, your schtick is simple annoyance. Effective, but also stupid and does nothing to further the discourse.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 1:01 pm to TbirdSpur2010
your schtick is trying to appear above the fray. it is called triangulation.
again, you want to regulate speech on here. it is ok if you and others think it is 'shite' but i don't have to stop posting because of what you think. i don't think most conservatives have a problem with my points on here.
you haven't named one specific thing that I've said that was objectionable.
two parties have a stranglehold b/c most people support one of the two parties. you are describing democracy as a stranglehold. lol
i'm not preventing you from talking about whatever you want to talk about. i contend the thread gets derailed by people like you who attack me without discussing anything i say. i respond to arguments on here rather than vaguely attack people.
again, you want to regulate speech on here. it is ok if you and others think it is 'shite' but i don't have to stop posting because of what you think. i don't think most conservatives have a problem with my points on here.
you haven't named one specific thing that I've said that was objectionable.
two parties have a stranglehold b/c most people support one of the two parties. you are describing democracy as a stranglehold. lol
i'm not preventing you from talking about whatever you want to talk about. i contend the thread gets derailed by people like you who attack me without discussing anything i say. i respond to arguments on here rather than vaguely attack people.
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 2/25/17 at 1:02 pm to Tillman
Oh my God dude, shut the frick up
Posted on 2/25/17 at 1:02 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Oh my God dude, shut the frick up
make me, internet tough guy.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 1:40 pm to Tillman
Lol, I've taken shits harder than you
Posted on 2/25/17 at 2:26 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Lol, I've taken shits harder than you
you went and searched internet for a picture of a teddy bear and you got somehting about 'throbbing member' under the picture. you are a dumb redneck.
i'm waiting for intelligent political commentary from you. lol
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 2/25/17 at 3:26 pm to Tillman
quote:
your schtick is trying to appear above the fray.
My "schtick" is acting through same way on here that I do irl (and don't think I didn't notice that you've changed how you want to categorize my posts. Last time I was supposed to be "grumpy ex-military guy, according to you Make up your mind, son).
quote:
you want to regulate speech on here.
Incorrect. I'd RA if I were wanting to do that. Just pointing out that you act a fool in these threads isn't "regulating," give me a fricking break.
quote:
two parties have a stranglehold b/c most people support one of the two parties. you are describing democracy as a stranglehold. lol
There's no viable way to combat the money stream that said parties generate to stay relevant, so k9st folks ensconce themselves in one camp or another. Otherwise you're wasting your vote/time. The GOP and the dems have a stranglehold on the current political system. That's really not up for debate. Just the system we have to work within for the foreseeable future.
quote:
i'm not preventing you from talking about whatever you want to talk about.
Never said you were.
Posted on 2/25/17 at 4:15 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
son
You are going to trigger him again
Posted on 2/25/17 at 4:23 pm to JustGetItRight
quote:
here is one person who resorts to name calling in every thread and it isn't me. And in case you missed it, sports is not involved in this conversation at all.
you seem uptight.
what names did I call somebody that you find objectionable? THis is thing about you and others on here,, you always attacking me but you never get specific. What names have I called people?
Do you consider calling somebody a liberal to be name calling? you probably need to toughen up a little.
i did call a liberal on here a hack because he or she pretends that PP doesn't receive tax payer money for abortions.
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 2/25/17 at 4:27 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
My "schtick" is acting through same way on here that I do irl (and don't think I didn't notice that you've changed how you want to categorize my posts. Last time I was supposed to be "grumpy ex-military guy, according to you Make up your mind, son
you are grumpy and always talking down to me.
you were whining about how I derailed the thread, the implication is that you want to regulate speech on here, and I am preventing you and others from talking about what you want to talk about.
most of what was being discussed on here prior to my arrival was off topic. It was a lot of sour grapes about Trump winning the EC but losing the popular vote, but changing our election system does not appear to be the topic. i would say malcontent liberals and other hijacked the thread topic.
this topic is about celebrating Trump.
have you ever considered that reason GOP and Democrats have more money is they have more supporters?
This post was edited on 2/25/17 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 2/25/17 at 4:36 pm to Tillman
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News