Started By
Message
re: Good news
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:55 am to DawgCountry
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:55 am to DawgCountry
quote:
But in the year Dabo DID win the MNC, it was arguably the toughest
But would not have played for the championship if WG is correct. ****according to the polls that were used for richt, dabo wouldn't have played for a title this year (so obviously woudln't have won one) and would have lost last year. **** So...he would not have that title. The years that Richt might have played for a title the SEC was tougher.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 5:57 am
Posted on 1/12/17 at 7:57 am to DawgsLife
quote:
But would not have played for the championship if WG is correct. ****according to the polls that were used for richt, dabo wouldn't have played for a title this year (so obviously woudln't have won one) and would have lost last year. **** So...he would not have that title. The years that Richt might have played for a title the SEC was tougher.
You know who else wasn't going to win a title this year under the old or the new system? Mark Richt.
Posted on 1/12/17 at 8:26 am to DawgsLife
This is really a pointless argument. The is no way to prove if the polls would be different without the playoffs in place. Other than jersey color, there is no risk is ranking a team 2 or 3 in the playoff. Without the playoff in place, the rankings would be under much for scrutiny and therefore might be different. I find it hard to believe a 1 loss Clemson team who won their division would have gotten snubbed in the BCS system in favor of OSU
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News