Started By
Message

re: Good news

Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:55 am to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58925 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:55 am to
quote:

But in the year Dabo DID win the MNC, it was arguably the toughest


But would not have played for the championship if WG is correct. ****according to the polls that were used for richt, dabo wouldn't have played for a title this year (so obviously woudln't have won one) and would have lost last year. **** So...he would not have that title. The years that Richt might have played for a title the SEC was tougher.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 5:57 am
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7903 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 7:57 am to
quote:

But would not have played for the championship if WG is correct. ****according to the polls that were used for richt, dabo wouldn't have played for a title this year (so obviously woudln't have won one) and would have lost last year. **** So...he would not have that title. The years that Richt might have played for a title the SEC was tougher.


You know who else wasn't going to win a title this year under the old or the new system? Mark Richt.



Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30571 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 8:26 am to
This is really a pointless argument. The is no way to prove if the polls would be different without the playoffs in place. Other than jersey color, there is no risk is ranking a team 2 or 3 in the playoff. Without the playoff in place, the rankings would be under much for scrutiny and therefore might be different. I find it hard to believe a 1 loss Clemson team who won their division would have gotten snubbed in the BCS system in favor of OSU
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter