Started By
Message
Which Tourney team should have been replaced by the SEC snubs?
Posted on 3/19/16 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 3/19/16 at 3:52 pm
This is a bit of hind-sight, second guessing, but we got very little respect as a league. Georgia, Vandy*, South Carolina, and Florida were all top 64 RPI.
The first team I see that had no business getting into the dance over Vandy or Florida is Texas Tech, and the result on the court proves it. Cal and Pitt were both less than impressive, although Pitt does play good defense. USC?
I mean, every other P5 conference got at least 5 teams in, and the SEC gets a big-time snub. The Big 12 and Pac were both obscenely overrated.
It seems like there should have been at least 4 SEC teams in, or at a minimum, have 2 play-in teams.
*I don't consider a play-in as being "in"
The first team I see that had no business getting into the dance over Vandy or Florida is Texas Tech, and the result on the court proves it. Cal and Pitt were both less than impressive, although Pitt does play good defense. USC?
I mean, every other P5 conference got at least 5 teams in, and the SEC gets a big-time snub. The Big 12 and Pac were both obscenely overrated.
It seems like there should have been at least 4 SEC teams in, or at a minimum, have 2 play-in teams.
*I don't consider a play-in as being "in"
3
Posted on 3/19/16 at 3:57 pm to KaiserSoze99
Wouldn't results on the court prove Vandy shouldn't make it? Didn't they just lose by 20?
Posted on 3/19/16 at 4:32 pm to KaiserSoze99
All of the Pac-12
Tulsa
Tulsa
Posted on 3/19/16 at 4:53 pm to KaiserSoze99
South Carolina should have been in and vandy should have been out. None of the others deserved to be in.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News