Started By
Message

So is Rosebowl not going to share the NOA

Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:13 pm
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21370 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:13 pm
He should have it by now.
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3341 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:15 pm to
He said he got it like 15 min ago.
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3341 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:31 pm to
Said they didn't send him the NOA or LOI. Sent him other documents involving suspensions and reinstatements.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64871 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:39 pm to
I remember our administration saying that the NCAA sent the NOA to our outside legal council.....which I seriously doubt is subject to FOIA laws.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21370 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:39 pm to
LOL, he is going to pop
Posted by Jackstraw55
Half a mile from Tucson
Member since Jan 2016
127 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

I remember our administration saying that the NCAA sent the NOA to our outside legal council.....which I seriously doubt is subject to FOIA laws.




Teehee
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3341 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:41 pm to
That could be right, but I was under the impression that any documents looked at by a university administrator in an official capacity were subject to FOIA. I don't really know.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64871 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

That could be right, but I was under the impression that any documents looked at by a university administrator in an official capacity were subject to FOIA. I don't really know.




Seriously doubt that.
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3341 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:47 pm to
The reason given was that the NOA wasn't present on campus and was with private counsel. It doesn't really matter, it'll all come out eventually when OM responds to the NOA.
This post was edited on 2/10/16 at 5:51 pm
Posted by chasjay
Member since Mar 2013
422 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

They reason given was that the NOA was that it wasn't present on campus and was with private counsel. It doesn't really matter, it'll all come out eventually when OM responds to the NOA.



Seems like that idea has been suggested and shouted down before.
Posted by Jackstraw55
Half a mile from Tucson
Member since Jan 2016
127 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:51 pm to
The physical location of the document has nothing to do with anything

The attorneys handling the case are a private institution (and not located in MS) and therefore not subject to MS FOIA requirements



Come on people, don't you think all our sneaky bear lawyers in tNetwork haven't figured out ways to circumvent some hack like Robertson. Please.
This post was edited on 2/10/16 at 5:54 pm
Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
3341 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 5:56 pm to
I didn't say the location was relevant. But since their client is a public entity, I'm not sure they're exempt from FOIA. But like I already said, I don't really know.

The FOIA, however, is a federal law, so whether or not it's in MS also isn't relevant.
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 6:02 pm to
Rosebowl is probably fuming right now
Posted by warcry
Mobile
Member since Aug 2011
4770 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 6:04 pm to
Who is rosebowl?
Posted by Jackstraw55
Half a mile from Tucson
Member since Jan 2016
127 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 6:11 pm to
For starters

quote:

But since their client is a public entity


A private law firm is not a public entity. Think government, public funded universities, etc....

quote:

But like I already said, I don't really know.




You've made that abundantly clear
This post was edited on 2/10/16 at 6:14 pm
Posted by RebelBearShark
Oxford, MS
Member since Feb 2015
657 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 6:13 pm to
It sure is taking a long time for him to come out with anything... Gimme a tweet or something.

He may be trying to figure out how to work in the second letter. I hear that one is gonna be even worse.
This post was edited on 2/10/16 at 6:14 pm
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

He may be trying to figure out how to work in the second letter. I hear that one is gonna be even worse.



Oh it is. Apparently several level 1 infractions all relating to current staff is the word on the street.
Posted by Badge
oslo
Member since Feb 2013
647 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 6:50 pm to
He's pissed.
Posted by HailFreezusOver
Oxford
Member since Sep 2014
6225 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 6:53 pm to
Can I get a link?

Where is he venting his frustrations?
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64871 posts
Posted on 2/10/16 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

several level 1 infractions all relating to current staff is the word on the street.




Word on the street is you smoke major poll. Gotta be true.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter