Started By
Message
re: As The Grove Burns: Laremy Tunsil Edition (Updated with Text Messages Link)
Posted on 2/15/16 at 2:49 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 2/15/16 at 2:49 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Needing help on coaching a girls intramural bball team?
0
Posted on 2/15/16 at 2:50 pm to hehatedrew
The coach? Their personal cell phone is open to review. Internal cell phone reviews led to two self reported violations of improper contact....one was allegedly a butt dial. 
Posted on 2/15/16 at 2:51 pm to pankReb
I get butt dialed daily. It's like sexting, but more like butt sexting...
Posted on 2/15/16 at 2:52 pm to lsufball19
quote:
I'll admit I have no idea if recruits' cell phone are subject to such a request
Recruits aren't government employees. Their information isn't open to the public.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 3:15 pm to pankReb
quote:Who bought the phones? There is your answer.
Recruits aren't government employees. Their information isn't open to the public.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 3:16 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Who bought the phones? There is your answer.
what phone? A recruits personal cell phone? Likely his parents....
Posted on 2/15/16 at 3:22 pm to pankReb
Back in my day they were called "go phones"...
Posted on 2/15/16 at 4:26 pm to hehatedrew
quote:
Back in my day they were called "go phones"...
go phones, at least what i called a go phone, was a phone where my number would work if i lost or damaged my phone and needed a temporary replacement. prepaid phones are when you buy a phone that has a specified amount of minutes. when you use up your minutes, you buy more. prepaid phones don't require you to sign a contract.
i don't know, maybe they're the same thing and i just called the shitty temporary replacement a go phone
This post was edited on 2/15/16 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 2/15/16 at 4:38 pm to pankReb
quote:
I do find it hilarious that they think "burner phones" is a thing now. Just goes show they watch far too much television.
The concept of giving a recruit a "burner phone" is pretty creepy. Not sure what the purpose would be unless it was to get around no contact periods or avoid running up a recruit's bill if they have a plan with limited minutes/text messaging/data. I guess it might make some guys feel appreciated and wanted to be issued a burner phone, but seems like it would freak a lot of people out.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 4:40 pm to DingLeeBerry
quote:
if they have a plan with limited minutes/text messaging/data.
That's the only logical reason I could see behind giving a recruit a phone.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 4:56 pm to pankReb
quote:Wouldn't that be a violation?
That's the only logical reason I could see behind giving a recruit a phone.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 5:01 pm to Diamondawg
Are you actually asking that question or just trying to be a smart arse?
Posted on 2/15/16 at 5:04 pm to pankReb
A go phone and a prepaid phone are the same thing.
Posted on 2/15/16 at 6:05 pm to pankReb
quote:Yes
Are you actually asking that question or just trying to be a smart arse?
Posted on 2/17/16 at 9:15 am to Diamondawg
Anything new happened since I've been on vacation?
Posted on 2/17/16 at 9:31 am to DynastyDawg
I imagine if a coach was shown to have given a recruit a "burner phone" it would be one of the highest level of violations a coach could make, perhaps besides lying to the NCAA.
You have an impermissible benefit (value of phone/prepaid card) and its use would hide an unknown amount of minor violations regarding recruit contact. The NCAA doesn't punish minor violations if the school self reports and deals with them by punishment guidelines but attempting to hide them to protect the coach from recruiting restrictions would probably be an ethics violation. I would see a show cause in that coaches future. I haven't heard anything about an allegation of this against Ole Miss so this is all hypothetical I guess. That would be a doozy though
You have an impermissible benefit (value of phone/prepaid card) and its use would hide an unknown amount of minor violations regarding recruit contact. The NCAA doesn't punish minor violations if the school self reports and deals with them by punishment guidelines but attempting to hide them to protect the coach from recruiting restrictions would probably be an ethics violation. I would see a show cause in that coaches future. I haven't heard anything about an allegation of this against Ole Miss so this is all hypothetical I guess. That would be a doozy though
Posted on 2/17/16 at 9:32 am to DynastyDawg
You could probably check Elite Dawgs to find out
Posted on 2/17/16 at 9:41 am to DynastyDawg
Up to 390 now. Does anyone know the record for tRant?
Posted on 2/17/16 at 10:11 am to SwayzeBalla
quote:
You could probably check Elite Dawgs to find out
I'm sorry, I'll leave that to the ole miss fans that are obsessed with them to find out.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 10:12 am to Blawdawg
quote:
I imagine if a coach was shown to have given a recruit a "burner phone" it would be one of the highest level of violations a coach could make, perhaps besides lying to the NCAA.
I haven't really seen much about this other than what has been presented ITT.
Where did all this burner phone stuff come from?
Page 15 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News