re: Altering a contract without a signature

quote:

---

The judge, pissed that the two sides are wasting his time on a case that should be settled, and the fact that at some level both sides are in the wrong

---

Look, we are dealing with news stories and no one has a copy of the contract, but you keep saying "both sides are in the wrong". Chavis' attorney has shot her wad on the "ateration" argument. The case would be over by now if LSU had materially altered the agreement to Chavis' disadvantage.

What matters is whether either party is in the "legal wrong". There isn't any proof that either side is legally wrong on any issue.

If the contract allows for attorneys fees and LSU proves any part of their case, even a reduced payment could be a big victory for LSU because they will get their fees.

In any case, bookmarked, and we can see how things really turn out when we see copies of the contracts or rulings.