Started By
Message
re: Watching the LSU Game Replay on ESPNU
Posted on 7/24/14 at 3:47 pm to Dawgsontop34
Posted on 7/24/14 at 3:47 pm to Dawgsontop34
I was at the LSU game and didn't notice cause I was tackling my buds as soon as it flew over Beckham's head. This was my first time watching the replay. He laid all the way out to pick it off. What a tard.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:10 pm to gatorhata9
quote:
Back to back plays in the 3rd quarter both announcers commented on the fact that we were "discombobulated" and "confused". Didn't know where we were supposed to be lined up and were "scrambling" at the snap.
Watch the game again and note the number of TDs Murray threw when the LSU DBs looked "discombobulated" and "confused." The Bennett TD pass and a couple of completions to Conley and Davis in the 3rd quarter come to mind.
Not denying the Grantham defenses have looked really bad during his tenure, but a good offense can easily confuse an average defense.
db
Posted on 7/25/14 at 12:27 pm to gatorhata9
bump for deeprig's input
Posted on 7/25/14 at 12:34 pm to gatorhata9
It has been explained a hundred times.
People see/hear what they want to see/hear.
Studies have actually proven that.
Although it is sad, it does give me the comfort of knowing immediately who is an idiot and who is smart/independent thinker.
People see/hear what they want to see/hear.
Studies have actually proven that.
Although it is sad, it does give me the comfort of knowing immediately who is an idiot and who is smart/independent thinker.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 1:19 pm to DisneyDawg
quote:
Georgia defense was terrible in that game
Hell there wasn't a lick of Defense from either team that game
Only thing more annoying was the girl in front of me with the damn pompom that kept hitting me in the face.
But all in all that was a fun game to watch and be at.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 1:20 pm to deeprig9
quote:
It has been explained a hundred times. People see/hear what they want to see/hear. Studies have actually proven that. Although it is sad, it does give me the comfort of knowing immediately who is an idiot and who is smart/independent thinker.
I apologize for asking this since I'm sure you have explained it many times, but what do you mean by this?
Posted on 7/25/14 at 1:22 pm to deeprig9
quote:
People see/hear what they want to see/hear.
oh good god.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 1:24 pm to deeprig9
quote:
People see/hear what they want to see/hear.
Studies have actually proven that.
So when Swann is trying to figure out what to do with the stacked receivers in the 2nd quarter him throwing his hands up in the air and looking towards the sideline was actually a planned signal to say I got this?
Posted on 7/25/14 at 1:28 pm to DirtyDawg
Perfect response from a Grady hopeful who wants to follow in dowdle's footsteps.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 1:37 pm to deeprig9
Please explain to me how I am trying to alter what I saw on that play ,and numerous others, with my own agenda?
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:03 pm to DirtyDawg
Deeprig is one of those posters who will never admit to being wrong. I don't expect him to in this thread but it was worth a try.
Deflect, deflect, deflect.
Deflect, deflect, deflect.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:43 pm to DirtyDawg
I've got a situation going on over here. Maybe I'll get back to you later. In the meantime, give me the 00:00 on the video of the play in question.
Or will you just deflect deflect deflect?
Or will you just deflect deflect deflect?
Posted on 7/25/14 at 4:21 pm to deeprig9
As frustrating as it was to watch our secondary play early on, it was even more frustrating to see the lack of progression over the course of the season. Either way played elite offenses game after game, or we just couldn't defend the pass very well.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 4:28 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I've got a situation going on over here. Maybe I'll get back to you later. In the meantime, give me the 00:00 on the video of the play in question. Or will you just deflect deflect deflect?
look in the original post
4:50 in the 3rd quarter.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 4:30 pm to deeprig9
LINK
Proof that you've asked the same shite and been given the link before. The point isn't necessarily that Grantham's scheme was too complicated. 2012 seemed to go pretty well with a secondary full of seniors. We returned one starter from that group, Swann, who had a great season in 2012. In 2013 he was supposed to be the leader. Maybe he kept throwing his hands up because HE didn't know what to do or because he was frustrated that he couldn't get everyone else lined up. I don't know. But what defensive coordinator worth a damn is going to keep calling plays and packages that his guys clearly don't understand? One of the first things Pruitt said is "if we can't run it, we're not going to call it." Grantham was too stubborn to admit that he was wrong, similar to you, and didn't simplify things for the young secondary. Sure, other teams may have had more talent, but that problem is magnified when your DBs don't know where the hell to line up.
Proof that you've asked the same shite and been given the link before. The point isn't necessarily that Grantham's scheme was too complicated. 2012 seemed to go pretty well with a secondary full of seniors. We returned one starter from that group, Swann, who had a great season in 2012. In 2013 he was supposed to be the leader. Maybe he kept throwing his hands up because HE didn't know what to do or because he was frustrated that he couldn't get everyone else lined up. I don't know. But what defensive coordinator worth a damn is going to keep calling plays and packages that his guys clearly don't understand? One of the first things Pruitt said is "if we can't run it, we're not going to call it." Grantham was too stubborn to admit that he was wrong, similar to you, and didn't simplify things for the young secondary. Sure, other teams may have had more talent, but that problem is magnified when your DBs don't know where the hell to line up.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 4:45 pm to bwood
Had 8 of 11 starters leave, bunch of freshmen in the secondary, and some rookie mistakes back there that cost us some games.
DL and LB play was great, and at the very least exceeded expectations with only 2 of the starting Front 7 returning.
Grantham is a good defensive coordinator.
DL and LB play was great, and at the very least exceeded expectations with only 2 of the starting Front 7 returning.
Grantham is a good defensive coordinator.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 5:01 pm to deeprig9
quote:
DL and LB play was great, and at the very least exceeded expectations with only 2 of the starting Front 7 returning.
3 returning starters Herrera, Jenkins, and Smith. I agree that the front 7 was good, but we're talking about the secondary. Stop deflecting.
quote:
Had 8 of 11 starters leave, bunch of freshmen in the secondary, and some rookie mistakes back there that cost us some games.
Which is even more reason to simplify things. Rookie mistakes happen, but it's even worse when you can't even line up correctly.
quote:
Grantham is a good defensive coordinator.
He was good when he had a very experienced defense. What coordinator wouldn't have success with the defense we had in 2012? That same unit also severely under achieved at times. But he refused to adjust in 2013 when those experienced players moved on. That, IMO, is not a good defensive coordinator. BTW, when you get a chance, Google his defense's stats when he was DC in Cleveland. His only other coordinator job.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 5:20 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Grantham is a good defensive coordinator.
Our freshmen played like freshmen in game 1 and game 13. They didn't improve.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News