Started By
Message

re: If UNC receives NCAA Death Penalty, will the ACC collapse like the the SWC?

Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

For starters, it is Richard Sherman.


Montiello is the one who posted his name incorrectly.
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3155 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

I have serious reservations that the Death Penalty will ever be used again.


You may be right. Kentucky's basketball program qualified for it in '89, according to the NCAA's investigating committee, but then that committee chickened out and let them continue playing.

quote:

Not only did it kill SMU, but it became a zombie for the next 15 years.


When Kentucky was given the death penalty in basketball in '53, they went right on back to winning. It's SMU's own fault that they took so long to recover.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64485 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

When Kentucky was given the death penalty in basketball in '53, they went right on back to winning. It's SMU's own fault that they took so long to recover.

trying to compare a program in the 50s to one 40+ years later is extremely naive. Not even comparable.
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 3:03 pm
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25872 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

When Kentucky was given the death penalty in basketball in '53, they went right on back to winning. It's SMU's own fault that they took so long to recover.

Not really a fair comparison. It takes a lot longer to build up a football roster than a basketball roster
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64485 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Not really a fair comparison. It takes a lot longer to build up a football roster than a basketball roster

not just that. the nature of college athletics as a whole are completely different now.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19307 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

How much would a UNC Death Penalty for academic fraud affect the ACC?


Unless you have Virginia, Clemson, Florida State, and everyone else not named Wake Forest on probation, AND the rest of the ACC somehow miraculously moves their campuses to North Carolina, the ACC will NOT go the way of the SWC.

quote:

On a side note: In your opinion, what punishment does UNC deserve for admitting to egregious academic fraud?


Death penalty. But you won't ever see the NCAA shut down a major program. You have to be some small D3 no-name school for that to happen.
Posted by Col Reb is my mascot
Member since Feb 2012
4165 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:08 pm to
UNC receiving a death penalty would be like Texas getting it. UNC runs everything about that conference, and it would severely hurt the ACC. But no, the ACC would not collapse because there are still other strong programs (unless FSU and Miami took it as their chance to join the B12). The NCAA is only going to slap UNC on the wrist though
Posted by Nimbus2000
Member since Jun 2013
1250 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:10 pm to
why have I never thought of UNC as some great superpower like Texas, Bama or Ohio State?
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

why have I never thought of UNC as some great superpower like Texas, Bama or Ohio State?


They basically control the ACC...along with UVA.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25872 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

They basically control the ACC...along with UVA.

One could make the argument that UVA is actually calling the shots. Regardless, those two are the main schools holding the conference together.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139838 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

unc is a much, much bigger power than SMU ever was-- UNC is a national team like Florida or Bama, SMU was just a regional power


You are just flat out wrong with that one. SMU was a national player. They may not have won huge, but they had the swag and the SWC was bigger in CFB than the ACC has ever been.

You have tpo remember SMU reach was just not in conference but the cheating they were doing was all the way up to the Governor.
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 3:17 pm
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:15 pm to
How is a non-powerhouse school like UVA responsible for holding together the second strongest conference in the country?
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25872 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

How is a non-powerhouse school like UVA responsible for holding together the second strongest conference in the country?

Money, academic prestige, political influence, and athletic excellence in basically every sport but football. They also are tied to the DC, Richmond, and Hampton Roads markets.
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
4409 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:17 pm to
UNC sells basketball tickets.

Basketball is how the NCAA makes its money.

Study it out.
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

political influence
Posted by Monkeypox
Columbia, MO
Member since Oct 2013
62 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Basketball is how the NCAA makes its money.


This is how Kansas has avoided shite for years.
Posted by ZouTigers
St Louis
Member since Nov 2012
179 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:25 pm to
JMO SMU failed to return to their previous form because:
1. their conference fell apart. When they went to the WAC nobody cared.
2. the money completely dried up
3. fans simply stopped supporting the team.

When you buy your players, the inability to buy them anymore tends to destroy your recruiting. Look back at their long term records against their rivals, they weren't very good for a long time, had a burst of excellence and then returned to form at an even lesser level.
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37596 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

UNC is facing the same kind of punishment. What they did is as bad if not worse than SMU or any other school the NCAA has punished before.


Not even close
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139838 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:31 pm to
The WAC was stupid in adding schools. They had the perfect conference for those schools, but got greedy and decided to be like the Big East before the Big East. SMU should have went indy until the war chest was back. Once Ford gave the cash, SMU became a player again.
Posted by dlc83
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
1829 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 3:39 pm to
The Death Penalty talk is ridiculous.

First, UNC has already been sanctioned by the NCAA (1 year bowl probation and loss of scholarships for 3 years). We are currently serving under these sanctions.

The University continues to investigate issues within the African Studies Department. These are academic issues and not NCAA (directly) related.

After Butch Davis was fired, the University has tightened significantly the academic standards for football players. UNC has always had a very good graduation rate for its athletes. No question Davis' staff cut corners and we deserve our punishment.

UNC is definitely the main power and driving force of the ACC. Duke is a main player as well. UVA is probably 3rd in conference influence. The "academic" three schools definitely listened to the football schools (FSU, Clemson, VT, Miami) in agreeing to add Louisville to the conference.

All talk of the ACC collapsing is old news given each school has now granted their licensing rights to the ACC for a ten year period.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter