Started By
Message
re: UPDATE Dawgrant Playoff Committee (Dry-Run) RESULTS ARE IN
Posted on 7/8/14 at 5:41 pm to K9
Posted on 7/8/14 at 5:41 pm to K9
Thanks K9. I know as a guest here I need to be careful as to how I phrase things and it isn't my intention to offend anyone on here. If it was I wouldn't want to be on here. There's enough drama for me IRL--for me message boards are meant to be recreational outlets.
Life's too short and all that.
But in all seriousness on the Committee issue I know there are other board members who want to play and I don't have any problem with someone taking my place.
Life's too short and all that.
But in all seriousness on the Committee issue I know there are other board members who want to play and I don't have any problem with someone taking my place.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:02 pm to Litigator
quote:
Ok guys, just for clarity here I honestly do not know why my post was offensive to anyone
I believe you. I really do. So.......let me try to explain it for you....
Litigator, The thread by the Busy-Body Twins is considered unwanted and intrusive by many here. But, for some reason, instead of responding to the same identical thread on the Arkansas board, you decided to barge on in to this one. And even took it upon yourself to hand over OUR thread to these people...........and to even suggest that these admin fiends should transplant OUR thread to the mouth-breather goon board that many of us try very hard to pretend doesn't exist....
Is any of this registering yet? Please confirm.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:13 pm to Jefferson Dawg
It is and I know from past history that at least among some (others have said they don't mind) these intrusions are not welcome. My response was a way of saying we've got the best thing going here--I have no interest in participating in any other Committee exercise on any other board or on tRant either but that's just me. Outside of the GSB I'm not aware of anyone else taking this on although admittedly I don't often peruse other boards (other my own). Others need to see how it's done--there are some good suggestions in our thread IMO. I wasn't trying to give anything away, not that I would even have the power to try to do so.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:31 pm to Litigator
This might be the biggest clusterfck thread I've read... think most "the rules" were edited 5 times and then after the fact...
I MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE PLAYOFF COMMITTEE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED
I MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE PLAYOFF COMMITTEE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED
This post was edited on 7/8/14 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:33 pm to Litigator
quote:
Others need to see how it's done--there are some good suggestions in our thread IMO
Let them lurk like they normally do.
The Czar idea was not hatched so that we could go and be tap-dancing monkeys for the assorted retards of ParrotRant.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:37 pm to Jefferson Dawg
I ALSO MAKE A MOTION THERE BE NO CHAIRMAN OF THE PLAYOFF COMMITTEE AND DEEPRIG BE APPOINTED SECRETARY OF THE PLAYOFF COMMITTEE
DO I HAVE A 2ND?
DO I HAVE A 2ND?
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:40 pm to Chris_topher
quote:
think most "the rules" were edited 5 times and then after the fact
Since not all czars showed, litigator and other alternates could have been added to the 13.
Instead, we have 14 somehow.
An even number.
That's clusterfrick potential right there.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:43 pm to Jefferson Dawg
Deeprig trying to run this shite like Clifford Roberts
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:45 pm to Chris_topher
quote:
Posted by Chris_topher I ALSO MAKE A MOTION THERE BE NO CHAIRMAN OF THE PLAYOFF COMMITTEE AND DEEPRIG BE APPOINTED SECRETARY OF THE PLAYOFF COMMITTEE DO I HAVE A 2ND?
Seconded.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:48 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
quote: Posted by Chris_topher I ALSO MAKE A MOTION THERE BE NO CHAIRMAN OF THE PLAYOFF COMMITTEE AND DEEPRIG BE APPOINTED SECRETARY OF THE PLAYOFF COMMITTEE
quote:ALL IN FAVOR VOTE "Y"
Seconded.
ALL OPOSE "N"
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:50 pm to Jefferson Dawg
Maybe, Deeprig could address the situation and offer his vision of how he sees this thing playing out?
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:53 pm to Jefferson Dawg
I would suggest closing this (dry run) thread at this time and creating a new one moving the agenda forward.
Scuttle and set a fire out in the harbor so the yankess can't use it.
Scuttle and set a fire out in the harbor so the yankess can't use it.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:56 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Maybe, Deeprig could address the situation and offer his vision of how he sees this thing playing out?
There's only 1 answer to that question and I can tell ya he ain't gonna say it.. demote him to Secretary of Rules Changes and Edits and we go from there, imo
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:56 pm to BarberitosDawg
Seconded.
Burn this fricker....
Burn this fricker....
Posted on 7/8/14 at 6:58 pm to Chris_topher
quote:
There's only 1 answer to that question and I can tell ya he ain't gonna say it.. demote him to Secretary of Rules Changes and Edits and we go from there, imo
Seconded.
Light this fricker up!
Posted on 7/8/14 at 7:15 pm to Jefferson Dawg
There were 14 because someone was being eliminated leaving 13.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 7:16 pm to BarberitosDawg
I second barbie's motion.
Posted on 7/8/14 at 7:18 pm to Chris_topher
Rules were never changed. Op was only updated for the results. This was just a dry run that included every idea that was put forth by the committee at the time, to see what would work and what would not. Everyone settle down.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News