Started By
Message
5
Posted on 4/16/14 at 9:57 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
AU could have very easily lost 2 more games than they did and not won the SEC, or hell even the division.
There were 124 teams that could have lost a few more games.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 9:59 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Well, he's not exactly wrong. AU could have very easily lost 2 more games than they did and not won the SEC, or hell even the division.
That could be said about every SEC Champion the last 10 years.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:00 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Well, he's not exactly wrong. AU could have very easily lost 2 more games than they did and not won the SEC, or hell even the division.
I think we might could've won a few more the year before and then retained chiz too. Glad it worked out this way.
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:39 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Well, he's not exactly wrong. AU could have very easily lost 2 more games than they did and not won the SEC
We were also about 20 seconds away from winning the National Championship..
A game that we "Should" have won
So it goes both ways
Posted on 4/16/14 at 10:43 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Well, he's not exactly wrong. AU could have very easily lost 2 more games than they did and not won the SEC, or hell even the division.
That is true. On the other hand, Auburn could just as easily been NC's. That article was spot on. It's a fun style to watch. It's obviously very difficult to defend. It's here and SEC DC's are going to have to figure out a way to slow it down.
I heard all year that there was no way that one dimensional Auburn could stay with that vaunted bama run D. almsot 300 rushing yards later.....Mizzou's rush D is the second best in the SEC. 545 rushing yards later.......FSU definitely has the best D Auburn has faced. They also have a month to prepare for Auburn. 449 yards of O later........(the D is what cost Auburn the NC, not the O.)
This post was edited on 4/16/14 at 10:54 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News