Started By
Message
re: More egregious championship rematch?
Posted on 3/28/14 at 9:59 am to bodask42
Posted on 3/28/14 at 9:59 am to bodask42
A is the more egregious matchup.
bammer did nothing to get to the rematch. they sat at home and watched other teams lose.
IF Kentucky got to the final game, they would have won 4 tourney games against the highest level of competition for a second chance at UF. Explain how that is unfair?
bammers being bammers I guess.
bammer did nothing to get to the rematch. they sat at home and watched other teams lose.
IF Kentucky got to the final game, they would have won 4 tourney games against the highest level of competition for a second chance at UF. Explain how that is unfair?
bammers being bammers I guess.
1
Posted on 3/28/14 at 10:12 am to SECdragonmaster
Dragonmaster... Bammer (x3). You're a real piece of work.
And in the case of Bama 2011, they won every game during their season except for an overtime loss against #1 team in the country. They did go on to win the rest of their games after LSU (which admittedly wasn't much since Auburn was really down that year). And despite what someone said earlier, the BCS wasn't about picking the 2 best teams who don't meet throughout the regular season, but picking the 2 best teams in the country, period. Once all the chips were down in 2011 that was Bama & LSU.
Yes Kentucky would have played their butts off to win 6 games and win their tournament in this situation, but they would have went 1-3 vs another team who made it all the way to the finals of the tournament. It's just a crazy situation to me.
But I think both situations are comparable which is why I posted this.
And in the case of Bama 2011, they won every game during their season except for an overtime loss against #1 team in the country. They did go on to win the rest of their games after LSU (which admittedly wasn't much since Auburn was really down that year). And despite what someone said earlier, the BCS wasn't about picking the 2 best teams who don't meet throughout the regular season, but picking the 2 best teams in the country, period. Once all the chips were down in 2011 that was Bama & LSU.
Yes Kentucky would have played their butts off to win 6 games and win their tournament in this situation, but they would have went 1-3 vs another team who made it all the way to the finals of the tournament. It's just a crazy situation to me.
But I think both situations are comparable which is why I posted this.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News