Started By
Message
re: SEC West teams will now have to beat Shorty twice...
Posted on 12/14/13 at 6:25 pm to AdamsHouseCat
Posted on 12/14/13 at 6:25 pm to AdamsHouseCat
The problem that every has is the assumption that Alabama is better with one loss than teams who beat them and/or have one loss or no losses.
If Alabama beats, oh, I don't know, say, LSU and goes 12-0 and LSU goes 11-1 and LSU makes it in because there is an assumption that LSU is just as good, if not better than Alabama, then we will see some objectivity. But, that isn't what happens.
My choice would be that we only have conference champions in the playoffs. Alabama fans are afraid of that requirement because they have only won 2 SEC titles since 2000.
If Alabama beats, oh, I don't know, say, LSU and goes 12-0 and LSU goes 11-1 and LSU makes it in because there is an assumption that LSU is just as good, if not better than Alabama, then we will see some objectivity. But, that isn't what happens.
My choice would be that we only have conference champions in the playoffs. Alabama fans are afraid of that requirement because they have only won 2 SEC titles since 2000.
6
Posted on 12/14/13 at 7:43 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
My choice would be that we only have conference champions in the playoffs.
And that's why you're a dumbass. The only point in a playoff is to get the best teams in, NOT to reward an inferior team for winning an inferior conference.
Posted on 12/14/13 at 9:13 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
My choice would be that we only have conference champions in the playoffs
and you can book it the "committee" will agree with you. every non-sec person in America would rather the sec have to earn their nc in a playoff. the 4 finalists will all come from different conferences in every year that it can be construed to be "fair" to the college football landscape. I think it a stretch that 2 teams from the same conference will get thru that committee.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:41 pm to AlaTiger
The problem that every has is the assumption that Alabama is better with one loss than teams who beat them and/or have one loss or no losses.
If Alabama beats, oh, I don't know, say, LSU and goes 12-0 and LSU goes 11-1 and LSU makes it in because there is an assumption that LSU is just as good, if not better than Alabama, then we will see some objectivity. But, that isn't what happens.
My choice would be that we only have conference champions in the playoffs. Alabama fans are afraid of that requirement because they have only won 2 SEC titles since 2000.
..................................................
If you're scared, get a dog!.....and y'all should be. Just ask LSU and Fla. what it's like playing them twice in a season. This proves that your know that Alabama is truly the better team or you wouldn't be scared to play them twice. 
If Alabama beats, oh, I don't know, say, LSU and goes 12-0 and LSU goes 11-1 and LSU makes it in because there is an assumption that LSU is just as good, if not better than Alabama, then we will see some objectivity. But, that isn't what happens.
My choice would be that we only have conference champions in the playoffs. Alabama fans are afraid of that requirement because they have only won 2 SEC titles since 2000.
..................................................
If you're scared, get a dog!.....and y'all should be. Just ask LSU and Fla. what it's like playing them twice in a season. This proves that your know that Alabama is truly the better team or you wouldn't be scared to play them twice. 
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:01 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
My choice would be that we only have conference champions in the playoffs. Alabama fans are afraid of that requirement because they have only won 2 SEC titles since 2000.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 11:39 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
My choice would be that we only have conference
You're obviously used to hearing this, but your opinion doesn't matter.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 7:01 am to AlaTiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/16/13 at 7:03 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News