Started By
Message
re: Would the SEC be much different if the HQ remained in Jackson, MS?
Posted on 2/26/13 at 12:12 pm to Shiner Bock Aggie
Posted on 2/26/13 at 12:12 pm to Shiner Bock Aggie
I'm not sure how much it matters.
The B1G has its HQ in Chicagoland, the Big 12 in DFW, and the PAC-12 in the Bay Area. Is the SEC any worse being in a metro area which is smaller than that of Greensboro NC (ACC HQ)? Should the SEC relocate to Atlanta?
The B1G has its HQ in Chicagoland, the Big 12 in DFW, and the PAC-12 in the Bay Area. Is the SEC any worse being in a metro area which is smaller than that of Greensboro NC (ACC HQ)? Should the SEC relocate to Atlanta?
2
Posted on 2/26/13 at 4:05 pm to Quidam65
By that logic, maybe the SEC would be better off with HQ in a small market. Easy access to a major airport has not kept the Big 12 healthy, nor has it helped the Big 10 remain competitive on the field.
Tupelo, MS? Murfreesboro, TN? Huntsville, AL?
Tupelo, MS? Murfreesboro, TN? Huntsville, AL?
Posted on 2/26/13 at 5:48 pm to Quidam65
Should move SEC offices in Atlanta, Houston, New Orleans or St. Louis.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News