Started By
Message
locked post

Opinion wanted on expansion

Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:30 pm
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
22163 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:30 pm
There is an ongoing discussion on the Texas sites that they need to join the SEC, because they see what is happening with A&M. I'd like the SEC school opinions here - NO A&M FANS. Our opinion is obvious.

My opinion is that A&M already served up Texas, and the sips bring more trouble than they are worth (A&M fan opinion). I think NC and VA are the eventual targets.
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15535 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:33 pm to
No. NO. Texass has ruined every conference they've been a part of. No.

I would've been perfectly happy in the Big 8 forever. Mizzou, nubraska, kansass, colorado, oklahoma, etc. It was all fine until the 4 texas schools came along and ruined it for the original founders (no offense aggie...mostly UT's fault).
This post was edited on 2/7/13 at 7:35 pm
Posted by dawg4lyfe
Member since May 2012
11662 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:34 pm to
We don't need Texas. They can take their TV deal and shove it right up their arse. Their fans would be the most annoying people on the planet.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84887 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:35 pm to
I wouldn't say they are more trouble than they are worth, but there is no reason to add another Texas team, just like there is no reason to add another Florida team or another South Carolina team. Expansion is about expanding your footprint so you can make more money on your schools network. Texas doesn't help in that regard.

That said Texas is one of the few big fish out there that could be gotten, so I think you have to at least look at it from a national perspective. Living in Austin I don't think they are a fit in the SEC the way way A&M is at all.

I don't buy the whole "they will ruin the SEC" talk as this would be a whole different animal and Texas simply would not be in the position to behave in the SEC the way they have in the past.
This post was edited on 2/7/13 at 7:38 pm
Posted by I Ham That I Ham
Oh Lord, it's hard to be humble
Member since Jan 2012
10773 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:36 pm to
/''\
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:37 pm to
Add them, along with FSU. The conference would then have both flagship state universities of the two best football states in the country.
Gotta do something about moving Mizzou to the West though.
Posted by General13
Mobile
Member since Dec 2008
1363 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:40 pm to
Hell no. Those whiny pansies already destroyed one league. They can whither and die on their own vine.
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:43 pm to
They don't bring any new tv market share. So no. We would be better fit picking up Oklahoma, a NC or VA school.
Posted by FamousAmos
Member since Feb 2010
3276 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:46 pm to
So we wouldn't want the #1 most valuable team in College Football in the SEC?
Posted by attheua
Tuscaloosa
Member since Apr 2008
5442 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:47 pm to
No thanks. They made that shitty conference into what it is and they can stay there.
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15739 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:49 pm to
Don't want them. UNC-Duke or VT-NCST so Mizzou can move to the west.
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:49 pm to
No brainer, yes. They are the richest program in the country. Any conference would be dumb to turn them down.
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:49 pm to
Send Mizzou to the B1G where they wanted anyhow. Add Clemson/FSU to the East and Texas to the West.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42574 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:50 pm to
The reality is if UTx wants in, they're in. No opinions are needed.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33963 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:57 pm to
Didn't Texas sign a grant of rights deal which turns over all of their TV money to the Big 12 for the duration of the Big 12 contract if they decide to leave? I just don't see Texas leaving the Big 12 in the foreseeable future. It'll be insane to fork over that kind of money just because of a little, bumpy patch.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49337 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:00 pm to
We'll take everyone but Texas and let the Longhorns form their own NCAA
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119453 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:06 pm to
The SEC has no interest in Texas. They have a team in the Texas market. It's about markets. They want a VA team and a North Carolina team. The next SEC expansion will be VA/VA Tech and NC State.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11368 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:09 pm to
Add Texas and OU, move Mizzou to the West, and Alabama and Auburn to East.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:18 pm to
I personally do not think UT is more trouble than they are worth. They would not be "special" in the SEC and would not be treated any differently than A&M (for example).

However, I do not want them now. They had there chance. They chose poorly IMO. The SEC does not need them, but they may just need the SEC if A&M and others start taking their recruits.
Posted by CowTownReb
Member since Jan 2013
353 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:20 pm to
We already have a footprint in Texas with A&M.

Will never happen. No way, no how.

If we ever do expand, it will be into NC and VA. Texas is done. They have the worst reputation, they are selfish, they are arrogant, and their attempts to sway and hold conferences hostage are well-known.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter