Started By
Message
re: "The Process"
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:27 pm to aw4au14
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:27 pm to aw4au14
quote:
I don't know what the hell he told those guys in 2008 to get the #1 class after sucking for a decade.
Sucking for a decade? No quite, but it was a bad five years prior to 2008.
And all-star recruiting staff. National title and SEC titles on his resume. NFL background. Amazing facilities and a vision for their future. Should I go on?
Auburn landed a top five class with Chizik in 2010. They were 8-5 and 5-7 the two years prior, not to mention Chizik's abysmal record at Iowa State. What were they selling?
1
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:28 pm to Dmiles2000
Im trying to figure what the point of this thread was?
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:29 pm to aw4au14
quote:
Recruiting is it, and only it.
Oh really? Pete Carroll's recruiting classes at USC in the middle part of the last decade were better than what Saban is bringing in now and he only won a single BCS title in a much weaker conference.
Obviously it's about more than just recruiting.
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:29 pm to LSUcdro
quote:
Im trying to figure what the point of this thread was?
A sudden outburst of jealousy.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:29 pm to aw4au14
quote:
What does Nick Saban's "Process" look like if he hasn't recruited like this
Better question, what does Alabama (with those highly ranked recruiting classes) look like without Nick Saban's process?
Answer:
Texas
It's talent and coaching (i.e., the process) no doubt about it.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:29 pm to aw4au14
quote:
Give me a break, all the "Process" is, is being a friggin' recruiting machine.
Chizik had, by Auburn fans account, superior recruiting classes, too.
and that netted Auburn ZERO sec wins this year. what's your point?
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:30 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
What were they selling?
They were doing the opposite of selling, my friend. That's how they did it.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:31 pm to aw4au14
quote:
"The Process"
quote:
2008 - #1 Class
2009 - #1 Class
2010 - #5 class
2011 - #1 class
2012 - #1 class
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:32 pm to aw4au14
Why would you worry about it? It is no more BS than "All In". What works at Bama probably wouldn't work at Auburn, so don't worry about it.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:34 pm to aw4au14
quote:
Auburn had 3 top ten classes and a good chunk of those players went pro or got kicked off the team.
quote:
2008 - #1 Class 2009 - #1 Class 2010 - #5 class 2011 - #1 class 2012 - #1 class
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:37 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Oh really? Pete Carroll's recruiting classes at USC in the middle part of the last decade were better than what Saban is bringing in now and he only won a single BCS title in a much weaker conference.
Obviously it's about more than just recruiting.
He won the 2003 AP title. He won the 2004 BCS title. He almost won the 2005 BCS title but Vince Young played the greatest game of his life.
They made something like 4 or 5 rose bowls in a row. They were a bigger dynasty than Alabama is now.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:39 pm to aw4au14
you're a funny AU fan, post more.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:41 pm to aw4au14
quote:Whatever makes you feel better.
They were a bigger dynasty than Alabama is now.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:42 pm to aw4au14
quote:
He won the 2003 AP title.
Not a BCS title.
quote:
He won the 2004 BCS title.
Vacated for cheating.
quote:
He almost won the 2005 BCS title but Vince Young played the greatest game of his life.
Even if he'd won the game it would have been vacated for cheating.
quote:
They made something like 4 or 5 rose bowls in a row. They were a bigger dynasty than Alabama is now.
Considering the Pac-10 in those years consisted of USC and everyone else, it's easy to see how he made those 4 or 5 consecutive Rose Bowls.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:44 pm to aw4au14
This isn't just recruiting, this is not a greatly talented team when compared to LSU who will have ten players drafted and the vast majority taken in the first four rounds. 2010 as easily the most talented team at Bama and they lost three. USC has every bit the talent Bama had and they couldn't do this against far inferior talent. If you don't recognize Saban for what he is you're either flaming or ignorant.
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:49 pm to aw4au14
quote:
They were a bigger dynasty than Alabama is now.
They weren't even a Dynasty.
:Jaguar fan gif:
One (vacated) BCS title =/= Dynasty.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:51 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Considering the Pac-10 in those years consisted of USC and everyone else,
I agree with this. Oregon's run has been more impressive to me.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:52 pm to aw4au14
quote:
Auburn had 3 top ten classes and a good chunk of those players went pro or got kicked off the team. Out off all the five stars we signed in the 2010 class (Cam, Dyer, Coleman) none of them played this year.
So, its not just recruiting.
Nice thread fail
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:53 pm to aw4au14
quote:
He won the 2003 AP title. He won the 2004 BCS title. He almost won the 2005 BCS title but Vince Young played the greatest game of his life.
They made something like 4 or 5 rose bowls in a row. They were a bigger dynasty than Alabama is now.
This thread is such a fail. You should log of noob. You're embarrassing yourself.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:56 pm to aw4au14
Texas
2009...#5 class
2010...#3 class, 5-7 record
2011...#3 class, 8-5 record
2012...#2 class, 9-4 record
2009...#5 class
2010...#3 class, 5-7 record
2011...#3 class, 8-5 record
2012...#2 class, 9-4 record
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News