Started By
Message
re: Which football program is greater historically: Texas A&M or Arkansas?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 1:09 pm to Burma Jones
Posted on 12/27/12 at 1:09 pm to Burma Jones
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
then why does this say otherwise? LINK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MN higher than both
Bingo
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:07 pm to Bench McElroy
Hard to decide. Both are about equal to me, but I will go A&m.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:09 pm to Bench McElroy
Arkansas and it's not even debatable. Did I do that right?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:13 pm to nc14
quote:
Arkansas and it's not even debatable. Did I do that right?
no what you need is some reasoning that will attract people to argue with you. Then when someone picks the most obvious counter point to your reasoning have some mind blowingly awesome way of making them look stupid. Once the person replying posts their 3 paragraph response where they call you names and all sorts of fowl things you should then post a u mad meme and leave the thread... that is how you do it right.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:17 pm to Bench McElroy
we've been in the SEC the last 20 years and we were the 2nd best team in the SWC when we were in it, not AM
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:37 pm to oklahogjr
Thanks, that sounds familiar.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:38 pm to DMagic
quote:
Arkansas. They have a NC right? Game over
A&M has one in the poll era and a legit claim to one before the poll era.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:41 pm to sorantable
quote:
Charter member with as many national titles as you
Hmmm.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:42 pm to TxTiger82
All before 1940
Pretty meaningless
Pretty meaningless
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:44 pm to Bench McElroy
How is this even a question? Was Bear Bryant ever the coach at Arkansas? Debate over.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:45 pm to tokenBoiler
quote:
Was Bear Bryant ever the coach at Arkansas?
world war 2 fricked us over on this.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:46 pm to Gladius Veritas
Exactly. Programs that we now consider to be bad (Aggy, Minnesota, Princeton, etc...) all won NCs in that era that nobody gives a frick about.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:47 pm to Gladius Veritas
quote:
Pretty meaningless
Why is that meaningless? Arkansas' one "NC" also came before integration (of football, at least).
It was a different time, yes. Arkansas' NC came a different time, too. Neither team has been all that successful (in terms of championships) in the post-integration era. Neither team has been successful in the BCS era.
So what, exactly, is your point?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 3:48 pm to Arkansasrazorback
quote:
Programs that we now consider to be bad (Aggy, Minnesota, Princeton, etc...) all won NCs in that era that nobody gives a frick about.
And people give a frick about 1964? I mean ... I do, but I consider myself something of a cfb historian.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:25 pm to TeLeFaWx
That's a nice picture telefawx, how many of those 43 touchdowns did he manage against LSU? I know he tried throwing some touchdowns to the wrong team.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:47 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:Trying to compare TAMU's weak conference accolades to an SEC team. Brilliant.
Which football program is greater historically: Texas A&M or Arkansas?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News