Started By
Message
locked post

If Wilcox didn't leave

Posted on 11/14/12 at 8:33 am
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20835 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 8:33 am
this Tennessee team would be the offensive version of Mike Shula's 2005 Alabama team.


Agree or disagree?

I agree. I think we would win 9 or 10 games and it would temporarily seem like Dooley isn't an incompetent loser, but it would just be delaying the inevitable.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Wilcox


who?


Posted by Jerry the Clown
The Ayatollah of Rock and Rolla
Member since Nov 2011
3272 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 8:39 am to
And to answer the OP, with Wilcox and this offense, we would most likely be 8-2 at this point.
This post was edited on 11/14/12 at 8:41 am
Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 8:42 am to
agree
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33976 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 8:51 am to
quote:

this Tennessee team would be the offensive version of Mike Shula's 2005 Alabama team


If you want to make a more direct comparison, I think 2012 Tennessee could have been 2001 LSU. They were awesome offensively with Davey and Reed but had issues defensively (108th in pass defense, 75th in total defense). The big difference though is that Tennessee would have had no shot at winning the SEC with a 10-3 record and three conference losses.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter