Started By
Message
locked post

First Preseason Top 25 (8 SEC teams ranked)

Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:11 am
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84885 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:11 am
Posted by RJYH
Member since Aug 2010
6923 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:13 am to
quote:

First Preseason

Nope, I've seen a few.
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:13 am to
who does UGA pay to continually be put on these pre season lists?
Posted by jdg91878
Do overs+Opinion poll politics =MNC
Member since Oct 2010
3742 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:17 am to
This one is the most accurate..

Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25333 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:19 am to
LOL
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:23 am to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164336 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:25 am to
quote:

First Preseason Top 25 with LSU at #1
Posted by Tigerbait337
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2008
20535 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:28 am to
Looks to be some nice match-ups next season

3 teams from the Big12 in the top 10 (Oklahoma/Oklahoma State/A&M)
3 teams from the Big10 in the top 10(Oho State/ Michigan State/Wisconsin)
2 teams from the SEC (LSU/Alabama)
2 teams from the Pac10 (Oregon/Stanford)
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 9:55 am to
It will be fun sending the Aggies home with another loss at JerryWorld, and taking away their top 10 ranking this time.

Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20831 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 11:24 am to
I'd have Alabama at number 1. I'd be pretty surprised if Michigan State is a top ten team next year. Ohio State may finish with a strong ranking, but they lose a lot on defense, so I actually don't think they'll be as good of a team as their final ranking may indicate. I feel like A&M won't finish that high, but I don't follow them that closely. Harbaugh drastically improved the quality of the Stanford team, but I'm interested to see how they do without him.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 11:44 am to
nd at 19 what a joke
Posted by HogKing111
Member since Nov 2010
3057 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

LINK


From the website: "Because of its pedigree, LSU can absorb one loss and still be in the championship picture. Given history, it might be able to absorb two."

I'm afraid if Arkansas is able to go 11-1 and win the SEC, that the voters would put two undefeated teams (b/w OU, Stanford, Boise St, FSU) in the championship over a one-loss, SEC Champ Arkansas.

Anyone else see that as a possibility for Arkansas or any other SEC team?
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33961 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:47 pm to
The ESPN rankings seem a lot more accurate to me besides their obscenely high ranking for Boise State. For example, Michigan State is ranked too high while South Carolina is ranked too low. Michigan State is NOT a better team than South Carolina. South Carolina has a better coach and far superior talent to Michigan State. I also don't buy Texas A&M in the top 10 or Stanford as a top 5 team. Stanford lost Jim Harbaugh and the Pac 10 can't be any worse than it was this year. I'll be very surprised if they finish the season with one loss again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter