Started By
Message

re: Emmert on Bruce Pearl and Cam Newton in USAToday

Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:46 pm to
Posted by Crede15
Member since Jun 2009
17214 posts
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:46 pm to
Another question for him about Pearl would have been why Dez Bryant was suspended for the year for lying to the NCAA while Pearl hasn't been suspended for the year for lying to the NCAA. Bryant didn't even lie about a violation, unlike Pearl.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83561 posts
Posted on 12/15/10 at 7:48 pm to
thats a really good question. geez the ncaa is so inconsistent.
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Another question for him about Pearl would have been why Dez Bryant was suspended for the year for lying to the NCAA while Pearl hasn't been suspended for the year for lying to the NCAA. Bryant didn't even lie about a violation, unlike Pearl.


The NCAA hasn't ruled on the Bruce Pearl case yet.

They very well could suspend Pearl for a year.

So that would mean, for lying about having a BBQ at his house.

Pearl is suspended for 1 year and 8 games, fined 1.5 million dollars, and suspended from recruiting for an entire year.

Would that punishment really match the crime?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter