It is factually incorrect to say that Penix was undefeated and Daniels lost 3 games

It is also factually incorrect to say that Penix was undefeated against good teams and Daniels was 0-3 or 1-4.

It is also factually incorrect to say that Penix "won when everything was on the line" and Daniels did not.

I don't have a dog in that fight but, those are stupid narratives and that kind of sophistry should have nothing to do with the award because it only serves to cheapen it and cfb as a whole.