Started By
Message
re: A Dynasty BEGINS at 3 Titles Within 4-5 Years
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:36 pm to Darindawg
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:36 pm to Darindawg
quote:
This thread looks like someone with autism, or at least a strong touch of Aspergers, wrote it.
To frame it in language OP is more likely to understand: OP, you’re a fricking moron.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:41 pm to PowHound
quote:
This is nothing more than a PSA for the confused portion of your fanbase.
Nah it definitely comes off as full-blown beta.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:43 pm to PowHound
quote:
23
So you have already won both gifted playoff games?
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:46 pm to PowHound
quote:
win a title against someone better than TCU.
They beat Bama for a title. Wait so this means Bama is worse than 5-7 TCU???
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:47 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
Winning 29 straight games...probably constitutes a Dynasty.
The previous record was 28 held by both Bear Bryant and Gene Stallings.
But the best frame of reference lies in the fact that Kirby Smart is only 48 years old and Saban didn't win his first natty until he was 52.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:51 pm to PowHound
Who died and made chowhound the boss of dynasties?
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:35 pm to BornAndRaised_LA
quote:
Sorry. 2011 doesn’t count by your standard…so that’s only 2 in 4 years…
Hilarious to see him own himself
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:43 pm to BornAndRaised_LA
quote:
I think dynasty should be a minimum of 3 championships in a nice round number, like 20 years.
Also, no need for there to be any consistency in coaching or anything tying those titles together
Very well done!
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:53 pm to PowHound
If your main point is that UGA hasn’t quite hit “dynasty level,” that’s a true statement.
But they’re about 1 NC over the next 2 years away from it and there’s nothing that says you can’t have 2 dynasties happening at the same time.
Celtics/Lakers, 49ers/Cowboys, etc.
But they’re about 1 NC over the next 2 years away from it and there’s nothing that says you can’t have 2 dynasties happening at the same time.
Celtics/Lakers, 49ers/Cowboys, etc.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:04 pm to PowHound
quote:
Once all the dynasties start running together you are allowed to claim the entire era as your dynasty:
09, 11, 12, 15, 17, 20, 23
Scratch off 20 and 23.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:04 pm to PowHound
At least next you, you won’t have this BS again where an undefeated Power conference team gets left out of the playoffs.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:09 pm to PowHound
I guess the question is can you have overlapping dynasties even if one is inferior to the other? Or does the presence of a competing dynasty nullify both claims? Think Cowboys-Steelers in the 70s, Lakers-Celtics in the 80s, etc.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:12 pm to PowHound
Can we not just be happy that the Georgia trolls have been quieted?
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:24 pm to PowHound
quote:
Weird this has to be said, but I see a lot of mUlliGAn fans on the board that seemingly have no idea what a dynasty actually is.
All they have to do is read an entry in a dictionary to see what a dynasty is. They should be able to do that. It's as clear as day.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:41 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
Winning 29 straight games...probably constitutes a Dynasty.
No, it doesn't.
Look it's not my opinion, it's fricken common knowledge that a dynasty can not be claimed until a third title is won inside a four-five year period. That is what makes them uber special. Otherwise any ol Clemson or mUlliGAn flash in the pan can claim a dynasty.
Concentrate on winning your conference one day, and then go for the dynasty would be my advice.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 7:19 pm to PowHound
It’s very odd how insecure Alabama fans are.
Posted on 12/7/23 at 7:20 pm to PowHound
quote:A record verses 1 team doesn't say anything. Bama rarely plays UGA unless it's in the postseason.
Georgia is 1-5 vs Bama under kirby. That is the opposite of a dynasty.
NCs matter most and they have 2 in row and could still finish top 5.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News