Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:25 pm to Dexter22
quote:
Have the families of Lecroy and Willock demanded retractions from UGA?
I know you think this is cute, but this is really stupid.
UGA doesn't write stories about Willock and Lecroy. Willock's family I think has taken legal action against Lecroy's estate and UGA. Likely a settlement will come. But we knew this would happen before it did.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:33 pm to koreandawg
I don’t think it’s cute at all…..two lives and families were changed forever. UGA officials were quick to point out Lecroy in a rental and not a university vehicle…..most university vehicles are loaners from dealers. UGA fans want it both ways. Cry about AJC, but defend Kirby and his den of thugs. What goes around comes around and house will eventually collapse.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:42 pm to koreandawg
It's telling that the letter does not threaten litigation if the AJC doesn't retract the article. Perhaps there are more details/skeletons UGA would not want to come out in discovery.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:49 pm to NotImber
quote:
It's telling that the letter does not threaten litigation if the AJC doesn't retract the article. Perhaps there are more details/skeletons UGA would not want to come out in discovery.
If that was the case, why would UGA act at all? Many are commenting first, without reading NINE pages….that explain pretty much everything. The author of the article intentionally misrepresented facts and blatantly lied. Whatever the motivation may be, Judd and the AJC were and are wrong.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:50 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Of course you can’t get the facts straight. Are you Alan Judd?
Were there not double digit criminal complaints? Did they all not go away when UGA got involved?
Which part were you told was incorrect?
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:51 pm to NotImber
quote:
It's telling that the letter does not threaten litigation if the AJC doesn't retract the article. Perhaps there are more details/skeletons UGA would not want to come out in discovery.
What's telling is that your legal expertise comes from watching My Cousin Vinny.
The first "lawyer letter" never threatens litigation. In fact, it's frowned upon by all bar associations for lawyers to threaten litigation. That's why "lawyer letters" never mention litigation. It's more of a wink-wink. This is step one. The other party can assume what step two is.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:54 pm to koreandawg
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:54 pm to ugastreaker
quote:
quote:
It's telling that the letter does not threaten litigation if the AJC doesn't retract the article. Perhaps there are more details/skeletons UGA would not want to come out in discovery.
If that was the case, why would UGA act at all? Many are commenting first, without reading NINE pages….that explain pretty much everything. The author of the article intentionally misrepresented facts and blatantly lied. Whatever the motivation may be, Judd and the AJC were and are wrong.
To put something in the public domain for people to see without really threatening the AJC at all. I've written similar letters in other legal situations but with a threat of litigation if nothing is done to rectify the situation. And if nothing is done, then you file suit.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:56 pm to deeprig9
quote:
What's telling is that your legal expertise comes from watching My Cousin Vinny.
Uh huh.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 6:57 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Were there not double digit criminal complaints? Did they all not go away when UGA got involved?
Which part were you told was incorrect?
11 supposed allegations, only three of which were cited, 2 of which turned out to be bullshite, and 1 of which resulted in player dismissal [even though he still hasn't had his day in court] does not equal "UGA rallies behind sexual assault, if you perform on the field you get to stay".
The articles Judd has been putting out are bullshite, the editors that let it come out are bullshite, and you are bullshite.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 7:10 pm to deeprig9
quote:
11 supposed allegations,
That would infact be criminal complaints.
quote:
1 of which resulted in player dismissal [even though he still hasn't had his day in court]
Dismissed or suspended indefinitely with UGAs AD supporting his “Pro Day” and giving him access to facilities and personal? I ask because there is a difference.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 7:12 pm to wesfau
quote:
For frick's sake. UGA should be grateful they don't share a state and media system with bama. The AJC has nothing on al.com's constant trashing of Auburn.
This could be a story about Corn Flakes and the Barn would find a way to complain. JFC
Posted on 7/11/23 at 7:16 pm to bigDgator
quote:
It's just a little letter and a little article. I don't know why you are getting so twisted up here. I am not on the side of the AJC.
This is like transgender story hour and gender ideology lessons in 3rd grade, a parent says "this doesn't seem right" and the left says "WHY ARE YOU OBSESSED WITH GAYS!!?" Straight pure textbook gaslighting.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 7:21 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Dismissed or suspended indefinitely
You got me. He wasn't dismissed. He was suspended indefinitely. That still goes directly against the AJC's narrative, a narrative that uses his case as an example.
It's like publishing a story that all the monarch butterflies are gone from Georgia, then using a picture of a monarch butterfly on a pine tree from last week as your headline picture.
Anderson was accused, UGA suspended him. Judd's narrative debunked.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 8:11 pm to Dexter22
quote:
I don’t think it’s cute at all…..two lives and families were changed forever. UGA officials were quick to point out Lecroy in a rental and not a university vehicle…..most university vehicles are loaners from dealers. UGA fans want it both ways. Cry about AJC, but defend Kirby and his den of thugs. What goes around comes around and house will eventually collapse.
I wouldn’t be talking too much trash with “UGA fans want it both ways”. If anyone has been crying about “unfair reporting” about Mr. “I wanna be a drug kingpin” and Mr. “I didn’t know he was going to shoot someone” it’s been Bama fans this last year….you should sit this one out.
Also you’re right “What goes around comes around and house will eventually collapse”. Sounds like you better start checking your house out over there and make sure that foundation is still good.
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 7/11/23 at 8:13 pm to bigDgator
quote:
Also I don’t know if I already wrote this or just thought it, but let any other school have a 40 year dry spell and then come close a bunch, and finally break through for 2 in a row, and consensus #1 going into next season.
#partylikeits1999
From your mouth to Gods ears BigD!!! It’s been my happiest time as UGA fan these last few years and I am savoring it!
Hope you’re doing well!
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 7/11/23 at 8:21 pm to Smokeyone
quote:Perhaps there were, but that is besides the point of wreckless narrative building.
Were there not double digit criminal complaints?
quote:
Did they all not go away when UGA got involved?
Of course not.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 8:28 pm to wesfau
quote:
The AJC has nothing on al.com's constant trashing of Auburn.
Everybody trashes Auburn. It’s fun. Try it sometime.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 8:33 pm to Dexter22
quote:
I don’t think it’s cute at all
Then write something that makes sense. You thought you were being cute or you don't know the meaning of the word "retraction".
The retraction they are asking for is not about Chandler or Dev and their accident. It is not asking for a retraction of any story written about them.
It is asking to retract a story where they are saying Kirby and UGA looks the other way and helps good football players who are accused of violent acts against women. Your response was stupid.
Page 6 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News