Started By
Message
Is Georgia the most underachieving program of all time?
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:31 am
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:31 am
It really blows my mind how Georgia hasn't been a more dominant program. Given the circumstances and resources, they should be far and away the best program in the SEC. Instead we are talking about the most underachieving program in the country year in and year out. For one their biggest rival is Georgia Tech. A superior academic school that could care less about the results on the football field. As a Tennessee fan, we have our own with Candy. This only helps recruiting wise as you can get the states top recruits with no competition in state. Next they forfeit a road game every other year to the Swamp, where every other SEC team has to play when their time comes. I think this is dog shite. Playing Florida in the Swamp as opposed to in Jacksonville is a big win for Georgia as the Swamp is much tougher than a split crowd in Jacksonville. Lastly they get the SEC Championship in their own state. Any time they make it it's a defacto home game.
How with everything going their way is Georgia such an underachiever? Nothing Kirby can or will do will ever kill this narrative.
How with everything going their way is Georgia such an underachiever? Nothing Kirby can or will do will ever kill this narrative.
31
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:32 am to WalkingVol
No
A&M
A&M
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:32 am to WalkingVol
Lmao, I'm not reading that 3rd grade level drivel.
Get a job
Get a job
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:32 am to WalkingVol
Maybe but they just won a Natty.
Wtf has Tennessee done in the last 20 years except just suck?
Wtf has Tennessee done in the last 20 years except just suck?
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:33 am to WalkingVol
Man the jealousy of Tennessee fans on this board really spills from their vaginal opening.
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:43 am to WalkingVol
Gotta go with Texas on this one.
How they only managed a couple of titles during a 30-40 year period of being the only massive resource-rich program in a massive talent rich state is mind boggling. They should have been putting up Ohio State/Bama type title counts through the 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s.
Talk about failure to capitalize on an ideal situation.
How they only managed a couple of titles during a 30-40 year period of being the only massive resource-rich program in a massive talent rich state is mind boggling. They should have been putting up Ohio State/Bama type title counts through the 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s.
Talk about failure to capitalize on an ideal situation.
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:45 am to WalkingVol
quote:
Is Georgia the most underachieving program of all time?
Hold my beer.
~Aggy
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:51 am to WalkingVol
Georgia shares the state with a program that has, at least a few times, been nationally relevant.
Tennessee shares the state with a program that hasn't been nationally relevant since the 30s.
Tennessee shares the state with a program that hasn't been nationally relevant since the 30s.
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:54 am to WalkingVol
I'm not much of a Georgia fan,but this is just stupid.
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:56 am to WalkingVol
quote:No, that would be Notre Dame, who has zero legit national titles. Georgia at least has one legit national title.
Is Georgia the most underachieving program of all time?
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:56 am to WalkingVol
Alter alert
Posted on 9/9/22 at 10:59 am to WalkingVol
quote:
Given the circumstances and resources, they should be far and away the best program in the SEC.
Explain how this pertains to 1892-1979, and further reveal your idiocy.
Posted on 9/9/22 at 11:03 am to WalkingVol
quote:you know, a lot of little men are getting their little man feeling hurts
Is Georgia the most underachieving program of all time?
Cmon - they bringing that littleman ca$h now..
Posted on 9/9/22 at 11:05 am to WalkingVol
Posted on 9/9/22 at 11:05 am to WalkingVol
As Tennessee fans we can't say a word. With our money and resources? To field the product they have fielded for the past 15 years.
Simply because they wanted to hire coaches on the cheap and let people like Jimmy Haslam have too much control.
Simply because they wanted to hire coaches on the cheap and let people like Jimmy Haslam have too much control.
Posted on 9/9/22 at 11:10 am to WalkingVol
Historically, yes, UGA has underachieved given available resources and in-state talent.
Historically.
What Kirby is doing now should be the norm.
And now it is.
Who's living in the motherfricking past now, bitch?
Historically.
What Kirby is doing now should be the norm.
And now it is.
Who's living in the motherfricking past now, bitch?
This post was edited on 9/9/22 at 11:12 am
Posted on 9/9/22 at 11:12 am to WalkingVol
Yes.
Posted on 9/9/22 at 11:12 am to WalkingVol
Stop using mustard to toss off when you're writing these posts.
Posted on 9/9/22 at 11:17 am to WalkingVol
By your logic, UF should have way more national championships since FSU and Miami weren't exactly national powers until the 80's in a state filled with talent. Same for UCLA. Located in a hotbed of talent with tons of money and yet they have nothing to show for it.
Everything doesn't go our way. Are you dumb enough to think state lines keep people from playing for out of state schools? Clemson, FSU, UF, AU, Bama, Tennessee, USCe are all within a short distance of the state. Most of the talent is coming out of metro Atlanta where a majority of people are transplants or children of transplants with no allegiance to UGA.
quote:
How with everything going their way is Georgia such an underachiever?
Everything doesn't go our way. Are you dumb enough to think state lines keep people from playing for out of state schools? Clemson, FSU, UF, AU, Bama, Tennessee, USCe are all within a short distance of the state. Most of the talent is coming out of metro Atlanta where a majority of people are transplants or children of transplants with no allegiance to UGA.
Posted on 9/9/22 at 11:25 am to WalkingVol
quote:You sound bitter.
WalkingVol
Yes, UGA has suffered for many years with poor or inconsistent coaching, bad personnel management, "unlucky" breaks, and the simple fact that we play in the hardest conference in the nation to dominate.
Even with all that said, CKS has had us in a competitive place for nearly his entire tenure at UGA. His great recruiting combined with the practices that he learned from Saban that creates and sustains great teams has led to success recently, and there is no indication that it will stop any time soon.
I don't know why you care so much about why UGA has struggled historically when we're dominant now, at least over most teams.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News