Started By
Message
re: Would we have won more games with Nick Marshall at DB last year?
Posted on 8/1/15 at 6:18 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 8/1/15 at 6:18 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:Absolutely right Rocky. Prosche took a couple of games to get into it, but he was a huge piece to our running game. Especially outside the tackles.
We also didn't have a great blocking back like the Hammer #35 Porsche.
He really was a beast. Seems like he'll have a long arse NFL career too as long as he stays healthy.
0
Posted on 8/1/15 at 6:30 pm to Tiguar
quote:
Nick Marshall was a fake punt away from getting a ring as starting qb.
Possibly. But if Cody Parkey kicks into the endzone like he did ALL YEAR, we would have won.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 6:43 pm to Pavoloco83
Fake punt.
Non-touch back.
frick you all.
Non-touch back.
frick you all.
Posted on 8/1/15 at 6:56 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
Oline was weak last year on pass blocking. JJ would have been chopped and stacked into cord wood.
Ya but I believe we would have beat TAMU and Wisconsin if our D didn't shite the bed.
I think NM was best option last year but I don't believe the regression on O would have offset the improvement on our dumpster fire D
Posted on 8/1/15 at 7:00 pm to GenesChin
quote:
Ya but I believe we would have beat TAMU and Wisconsin if our D didn't shite the bed.
I think NM was best option last year but I don't believe the regression on O would have offset the improvement on our dumpster fire D
The other side to this coin is it wouldn't have mattered who was at DB. The dline couldn't get a pass rush and neither Frost nor Cass can blitz work a damn. The DB's were hung out to dry last season.
This post was edited on 8/1/15 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 8/1/15 at 7:02 pm to beatbammer
quote:
Fake punt.
Non-touch back.
frick you all.
Plus missed FG
frick Cody
Posted on 8/1/15 at 7:04 pm to LanierSpots
Or if we make a tackle on that long run on the last drive.
There's so many simple things we could've done that would've won us that game. That's the worst part about that game.
Why are we talking about this?
There's so many simple things we could've done that would've won us that game. That's the worst part about that game.
Why are we talking about this?
This post was edited on 8/1/15 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 8/3/15 at 9:05 am to LanierSpots
quote:
He made plays for us that I do not believe JJ can make
True, but I don't think Gus would put JJ in those same situations.
Posted on 8/3/15 at 9:20 am to HDAU
quote:
True, but I don't think Gus would put JJ in those same situations.
Agree. It will look different. Which worries me.
And sometimes situations just happen. QB will not always be in a comfy pocket. He will have to scramble and improvise. This is the part of JJ's game I am interested in seeing. And i am sure I am not alone
I do like the fact that we will have another calm QB. But one that can hit the open receivers most of the time. That was missed with Nick.
Im excited but nervous as well. Cant wait of things to get started.
Posted on 8/3/15 at 9:54 am to LanierSpots
quote:
Im excited but nervous as well. Cant wait of things to get started.
Bout time to get my mind and my priorities right. Bring it ON.
Posted on 8/3/15 at 11:35 am to Tigerman97
quote:
The other side to this coin is it wouldn't have mattered who was at DB. The dline couldn't get a pass rush and neither Frost nor Cass can blitz work a damn. The DB's were hung out to dry last season.
This as I said earlier was the biggest issue in our losses last season.
Posted on 8/3/15 at 1:42 pm to LanierSpots
quote:
QB will not always be in a comfy pocket. He will have to scramble and improvise. This is the part of JJ's game I am interested in seeing.
I completely agree. If JJ proves that he can tuck it and get up field on a busted play he will force the linebackers to be honest.
Page 2 of 2
Latest Auburn News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News