Started By
Message
re: 2015 NSD Thread: BOOOOOOMMM!!! We done?
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:58 am to AUtigR24
Posted on 1/27/15 at 7:58 am to AUtigR24
quote:As would we.
Wouldn't put it past BOL, but not the case here. Bama has a plan to place Chidi in prep school should he not qualify.
And for the love of God please say where you are getting your bama stuff since we have asked many times or just shut the frick up about Bama please. It's annoying as hell.
2
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:01 am to ellitor
and this is when it gets snippy. Later than usual this year. Congrats.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:05 am to ellitor
Per AU Rivals juco WR Dominique Reed Will visit this weekend. He had 61 catches for 1,157 yards and 19 touchdowns in 2014. Highlights
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:05 am to ellitor
quote:
2015 NSD/Recruiting Thread (Last Update 1/26 11:25 PM) Dinson Commits Free read on Chidi LINK
quote:
This has to do with me and my God. I always pray to my God to direct me. … I have to give myself a little bit of time and ask God to direct me
Auburn lock
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:07 am to ellitor
Boom, there's that 6'4 receiver I was asking about 
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:09 am to piggidyphish
quote:Been snippy on that front. He's been doing it a month now and ignores everybody when we ask him where he gets the info from. It's like he's a Bama errand boy lately.
and this is when it gets snippy. Later than usual this year. Congrats.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:11 am to ellitor
Him and weagle25.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:14 am to AUCE05
quote:Yeah but with weagle we know he don't make stuff up and he doesn't shy away from questions when they are asked to him. Plus the BWB post was comedy.
Him and weagle25.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:20 am to ellitor
Weagle is jumping into a fight late, and doesn't know what is going on. Oddly, he is siding with the gumps.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 8:21 am
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:25 am to AUCE05
Anyway for the big WR the staff wants I like Reed over Camion. I see Camion as a chain mover and I feel we have enough of them. Reed looks like a more big play guy to me.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:26 am to ellitor
I think its pretty apparent AuTger24 is a douche.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:32 am to ellitor
I had a post yesterday about this, and I feel the same way. We need taller WRs.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 8:33 am
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:36 am to AUCE05
quote:
I had a post yesterday about this, and I feel the same way. We need taller WRs.
I want a RiCardo Louis clone with the added "Catching Ability" aftermarket feature.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:37 am to AUtigR24
Everyone who gets so worked up about the number of stars a player has based on rankings should take a look at thie SDS article. Granted, I don't really think a lot of their posts are worth a damn, but this is decent and provides some good talking points.
LINK /
quote:
In the last 10 years, a mere 287 players have emerged from high school as five-star recruits — the best of the best. That’s fewer than 30 players per season regardless of position.
By our best judgments, just 97 of those have lived up to the hype and become a star equal to expectations. That’s just 33.8 percent, or barely more than one in three.
LINK /
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:47 am to atlau
Not this again...
No one has said the star ranking is perfect. But the likely-hood of a 5* making a significant impact in college is greater than that of a 4*, 3*, and 2*.
quote:And that's probably the highest percentage for any star ranking. Break down all the 4*s, 3*s, and 5000 2*s from each recruiting year and see how productive those percentages are.
That’s just 33.8 percent, or barely more than one in three.
No one has said the star ranking is perfect. But the likely-hood of a 5* making a significant impact in college is greater than that of a 4*, 3*, and 2*.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 8:54 am to joeyb147
quote:
And that's probably the highest percentage for any star ranking. Break down all the 4*s, 3*s, and 5000 2*s from each recruiting year and see how productive those percentages are.
No one has said the star ranking is perfect. But the likely-hood of a 5* making a significant impact in college is greater than that of a 4*, 3*, and 2*.
But it is why every school has 4 and 5 star bust, we just melt over our 4 and 5 star bust, but forget others.
Posted on 1/27/15 at 9:07 am to joeyb147
And the most important stat that should concern us is every national champion in the last 17 years Had at least 3 out of 4 top 12 classes going into their natty year. All but 3 natty losers did as well. Oregon (2010 & 2014) and Vick Tech (1999). Rankings matter on the whole.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 9:08 am
Posted on 1/27/15 at 9:07 am to AUCE05
quote:
Weagle is jumping into a fight late, and doesn't know what is going on. Oddly, he is siding with the gumps.
Because they're right.
Multiple sites confirmed what BOL said about Chidi. He's an academic risk. They backed off him for awhile. Chidi delaying his decision all but confirmed the fact that they backed off and recently started coming after him again. But since it's Bama we choose not to believe them.
And it was a rumor that he was a qualifying risk way before Bama backed off.
If there's something beyond the Chidi thing, then I haven't been involved in any of that
But I'm not going to turn this thread into an argument about it, so that's my last post on the subject
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 9:16 am
Posted on 1/27/15 at 9:14 am to Weagle25
According to 247 we would take Ivey and Chidi, which is a surprise for me
Posted on 1/27/15 at 9:16 am to ellitor
People who use the line of "there are no 5* in the Super Bowl" have a problem understanding sample size.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 9:17 am
Page 124 of 364
Latest Auburn News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News