Started By
Message
Do you think we missed on the Crockett kid who went to mizzou
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:47 am
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:47 am
I know Whaley looks legit but do you think he will end up being just as good as him or better and hammonds?
9
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:55 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
All three look good. None look like busts. We weren't taking all three. Crisis averted.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:56 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Man, I just saw some flashes out of Hammonds that got me very excited for the future.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 11:06 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
It would be great to have Crockett as well but RB shouldn't really ever be a concern for us going forward. That is probably the position I worry the least about under Bert.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 2:01 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
A pretty solid RB even with his issues with the whacky weed. The thing is... we are loaded with pretty solid RBs right now. We are loaded to the gills with top notch RBs. Sure I wish we had him... but he might have gotten lost in the mix of a ton of potentially great RBs here.
A very, very, good get for Missouri though.
A very, very, good get for Missouri though.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 2:56 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
Crockett is good, but Whaley is far and away the better back. Hammonds brings more to the table overall so I'm more than pleased with the route we took.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 6:56 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
No
Posted on 1/17/17 at 8:17 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
Crockett looked good and played great on a shite team. Hammonds barely saw the field on a mediocre team but flashed once or twice when called upon.
Tough to know who works out long term. My money is on kid not ending up suspended for smoking weed. Nothing to do with weed but come on you gotta know how to nor get caught by now
Tough to know who works out long term. My money is on kid not ending up suspended for smoking weed. Nothing to do with weed but come on you gotta know how to nor get caught by now
Posted on 1/17/17 at 8:22 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Crockett looked good and played great on a shite team. Hammonds barely saw the field on a mediocre team but flashed once or twice when called upon.
Crockett might not see the field either if RW3 and Whaley were at Mizzou. You've got to look at the whole depth chart.
This post was edited on 1/17/17 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 1/17/17 at 8:28 pm to TheCheshireHog
Some are melting down over the north side player who decommitted from Louisville not being visit by Bert while other shitty defense non sec teams are swooping in...
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:03 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Crockett might not see the field either if RW3 and Whaley were at Mizzou. You've got to look at the whole depth chart.
I'm thinking he doesn't either although maybe could have competed with Whaley for time early on as Whaley seemed way behind to start the year.
I like Hammonds and he seems like a high ceiling guy we need to give the ball to. it's just a shame we never found room for crockett.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:16 pm to oklahogjr
If they took him, he could have been the next wingo used to run one route for four years while the work horse Davis/Whaley left those wondering why they explosive player Johnson/Hammonds doesn't get more touches.
Posted on 1/17/17 at 10:35 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
If they took him, he could have been the next wingo used to run one route for four years while the work horse Davis/Whaley left those wondering why they explosive player Johnson/Hammonds doesn't get more touches.
Well and the consequence no one is thinking of. We could of possibly been mizzous only win of the season without him.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 2:11 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
no
Posted on 1/18/17 at 8:37 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
Many years, Crockett would have been a take. Just came along at a time where there were others ahead of him.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News