Started By
Message
Anyone wish we would go old school offense
Posted on 10/9/16 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 10/9/16 at 1:58 pm
Had a dream we went back to running alot more with a fullback and more TE passes.
This post was edited on 10/9/16 at 2:00 pm
23
Posted on 10/9/16 at 2:19 pm to Sebastian
Doesn't matter to me long as the offense is productive.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 2:24 pm to Sebastian
Someone made a similar thread and got slammed. Prepare for some unnecessary insults by some of longer tenured posters around here. 
Posted on 10/9/16 at 2:32 pm to Sebastian
Lol....wat? We are using the tools we have. If we had a mark Ingram back there I'm sure they would run it more.
I don't know that we've ever had an offense this productive so to answer your question, no.
I don't know that we've ever had an offense this productive so to answer your question, no.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 2:34 pm to FourThreeForty
Ok, I will grab the lube and wait for the onslaught. It was just a simple question. I think seeing Jacobs, BoScar, and Emmons got me thinking of a pound it out offense.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 2:40 pm to I Love Bama
I didnt recommend switching offense.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 2:45 pm to Sebastian
Every week another thread about the offense. Could of easily put 60 on Arkansas if it wasn't for fumbles. Enjoy Kiffin while he is here.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 3:36 pm to KareemAbdul
But all the defensive scores and quick offensive scores gets our defense gassed. I'd like to see more clock control by our O personally or it could come back to bite us in the arse against a deeper team.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 3:40 pm to Sebastian
No thanks.
I've lived through the eras where 3rd and six practically guaranteed a punt.
I've lived through the eras where 3rd and six practically guaranteed a punt.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 3:59 pm to Sebastian
Hell no.
We'd still NEVER pass it to OJ and Hale Hentges would try to tackle one of our own.
We'd still NEVER pass it to OJ and Hale Hentges would try to tackle one of our own.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 4:07 pm to Sebastian
This is one of the most productive offenses we've had in years, and you want to change it? 
Posted on 10/9/16 at 4:20 pm to Sebastian
Scoring offense:
1. Bama 44.8
2. Miss 41.6
3. A&M 40.2
4. Mizzou 37.0
5. Arky 35.0
6. UT 33.8
7. Auburn 32.3
8. UF 28.4
9. UGA 26.4
10. MSU 25.6
11. LSU 25.2
12. UK 24.5
13. Vandy 19.0
14. USCe 17.8
Total Offense:
1. A&M 532.8
2. Mizzou 508.6
3. Miss 491.4
4. Bama 489.8
5. Auburn 479.2
6. Arky 448.3
7. UT 432.0
8. UGA 408.8
9. UF 407.2
10. MSU 404.8
11. LSU 398.4
12. UK 350.5
13. USCe 301.8
14. Vandy 299.5
Yards per play:
1. Miss 7.0
2. Bama 6.9
3. A&M 6.8
4. Mizzou 6.5
5. Arky 6.3
6. LSU 6.3
7. Auburn 6.0
8. UT 5.8
9. MSU 5.7
10. UF 5.6
11. UK 5.6
12. UGA 5.4
13. USCe 4.7
14. Vandy 4.5
Rushing offense:
1. A&M 274.3
2. Auburn 262.8
3. Bama 237.0
4. LSU 237.0
5. MSU 197.4
6. UGA 193.6
7. UT 192.5
8. UK 191.8
9. Arky 176.3
10. UF 160.8
11. Miss 158.0
12. Mizzou 158.0
13. Vandy 147.2
14. USCe 104.8
Passing Offense
1. Mizzou 350.6
2. Miss 333.4
3. Arky 272.0
4. A&M 258.5
5. Bama 252.8
6. UF 246.4
7. UT 239.5
8. Auburn 216.3
9. UGA 215.2
10. MSU 207.4
11. USCe 197.0
12. LSU 161.4
13. UK 158.7
14. Vandy 152.3
Why would we want to change this?
1. Bama 44.8
2. Miss 41.6
3. A&M 40.2
4. Mizzou 37.0
5. Arky 35.0
6. UT 33.8
7. Auburn 32.3
8. UF 28.4
9. UGA 26.4
10. MSU 25.6
11. LSU 25.2
12. UK 24.5
13. Vandy 19.0
14. USCe 17.8
Total Offense:
1. A&M 532.8
2. Mizzou 508.6
3. Miss 491.4
4. Bama 489.8
5. Auburn 479.2
6. Arky 448.3
7. UT 432.0
8. UGA 408.8
9. UF 407.2
10. MSU 404.8
11. LSU 398.4
12. UK 350.5
13. USCe 301.8
14. Vandy 299.5
Yards per play:
1. Miss 7.0
2. Bama 6.9
3. A&M 6.8
4. Mizzou 6.5
5. Arky 6.3
6. LSU 6.3
7. Auburn 6.0
8. UT 5.8
9. MSU 5.7
10. UF 5.6
11. UK 5.6
12. UGA 5.4
13. USCe 4.7
14. Vandy 4.5
Rushing offense:
1. A&M 274.3
2. Auburn 262.8
3. Bama 237.0
4. LSU 237.0
5. MSU 197.4
6. UGA 193.6
7. UT 192.5
8. UK 191.8
9. Arky 176.3
10. UF 160.8
11. Miss 158.0
12. Mizzou 158.0
13. Vandy 147.2
14. USCe 104.8
Passing Offense
1. Mizzou 350.6
2. Miss 333.4
3. Arky 272.0
4. A&M 258.5
5. Bama 252.8
6. UF 246.4
7. UT 239.5
8. Auburn 216.3
9. UGA 215.2
10. MSU 207.4
11. USCe 197.0
12. LSU 161.4
13. UK 158.7
14. Vandy 152.3
Why would we want to change this?
Posted on 10/9/16 at 5:05 pm to LukeSidewalker
quote:
I'd like to see more clock control by our O personally
Tell Arkansas to tackle better than. It isn't like we were gashing them over the top.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 5:30 pm to Sebastian
Long as we are winning titles I don't care how the offense is doing it. I personally love what Kiffin is doing but if smash mouth is what is required to win, then I'll love smash mouth too.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 5:37 pm to Sebastian
O how soon some of y'all forget how inept at times the Alabama offense was during the "pound it" years under Saban. This offense is just scratching surface. It has a chance to be scary by years end.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 5:46 pm to Sebastian
No.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 5:54 pm to Sebastian
As someone who grew up watching 3 yards and a cloud of dust, it's nice to know that of the defense gives up 21 points it won't take a miracle to win.
As long as the defense doesn't suffer as a result and remains the top priority, then I'm all for opening up the offense and keeping up with the times.
I don't want to see a spread or any bullshite, but recruits want to play in an offense that scores points.
As long as the defense doesn't suffer as a result and remains the top priority, then I'm all for opening up the offense and keeping up with the times.
I don't want to see a spread or any bullshite, but recruits want to play in an offense that scores points.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 6:20 pm to Sebastian
We lead the SEC in Yards Per Play with a true freshman QB. What is the problem with our current offense? We get too many yards too quickly?
Posted on 10/9/16 at 6:26 pm to Sebastian
I'll trust the coaches know what they are doing, they have consistently proven that over the years.
That having been said it does seem like we show far more consistency when we go back to old school style football (power running, screen passes, short routes to the WR/TE, etc.)
If we never run another pop pass to the WR ever again it'd make me happy...
but once again, we don't see the players every day in practice and don't know exactly how the game plan fits together.
That having been said it does seem like we show far more consistency when we go back to old school style football (power running, screen passes, short routes to the WR/TE, etc.)
If we never run another pop pass to the WR ever again it'd make me happy...
but once again, we don't see the players every day in practice and don't know exactly how the game plan fits together.
Posted on 10/9/16 at 6:26 pm to Swm323
quote:Does this take into consideration the 10.5 ppg the defense scores?
1. Bama 44.8
Page 1 of 3
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News