Started By
Message

Stafford To Become Highest Paid QB Of All Time

Posted on 8/28/17 at 9:13 pm
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49261 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 9:13 pm
5 years $135 million
LINK
This post was edited on 8/28/17 at 9:34 pm
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
9416 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 9:18 pm to
That's great for him! But eveytime a QB signs a deal they become the highest paid it seems.
Posted by DragginFly
Under the Mountain;By the Lake
Member since Oct 2014
3597 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 9:30 pm to
Said to be $135M over 5 years.

And the boob job is already paid for.

Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44814 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

That's great for him! But eveytime a QB signs a deal they become the highest paid it seems.


Good starting quarterbacks have more leverage than anyone else in North American sports besides LeBron.

He's been pretty good for the most part. If Detroit lets him walk and starts a backup, they're a cellar dweller. I've always thought that there isn't much difference between most NFL rosters besides OL and QB. The 1998 Vikings was the best offense I've ever seen, but that team goes 6-10 if they have Brock Osweiler at QB. Good QBs are the hardest thing to find in sports.
Posted by WhopperDawg
Member since Aug 2013
3073 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 10:38 pm to
All of that my be true, but Stafford being the highest paid QB just is silly wrong,
Posted by Baxter
Athens Ga
Member since Feb 2015
465 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 12:13 am to
The basketball players are getting $200 million. Giancarlo Stanton is getting $325 million. The money is ridiculous these days
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17474 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 6:20 am to
quote:

The money is ridiculous these days


That's because the fans are even more stupid.
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26174 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 6:48 am to
quote:

All of that my be true, but Stafford being the highest paid QB just is silly wrong,


At face value, sure. But it's solely indicative of the current market, cap room, and timing of the signing. Every top 15 qb that renegotiates his deal is going to be one of the highest paid players until the next top qb signs his new deal. That's going to be the way it is as long as there's a scarcity of quality starting qb's.
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
5875 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

pretty good for the most part


That's definitely the kind of glowing review that merits the highest pay ever for a QB.
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
5875 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

That's because the fans are even more stupid.


The fan numbers have been dropping. It's the TV bucks that are driving it.
Posted by SthGADawg
Member since Nov 2007
7035 posts
Posted on 8/30/17 at 8:32 am to
Kelly would get it.
Posted by HTDawg
Member since Sep 2016
6683 posts
Posted on 8/30/17 at 8:49 am to
quote:

All of that my be true, but Stafford being the highest paid QB just is silly wrong,


Considering he's a damn good QB and the only thing on that team worth a damn, there's nothing silly about it. The only reason Detroit has become halfway respectable, the only reason they've done anything is because of Stafford. He has put up prolific numbers behind awful offensive lines and no running game to speak of, with middling defenses to boot. That team last year had no business being in the playoffs. He was the reason they were there. They win maybe one game without him last year.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17474 posts
Posted on 8/30/17 at 9:07 am to
quote:

It's the TV bucks that are driving


And what's behind the TV bucks? Fans. If not for fans, there would be no demand.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27297 posts
Posted on 8/30/17 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Fans. If not for fans, there would be no demand.


So fans are stupid for watching games on TV?
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17474 posts
Posted on 8/30/17 at 9:20 am to
quote:

So fans are stupid for watching games on TV?


No, but for creating the demand that drives such outrageous salaries. Do you think that if the TV market wasn't there that the players would be paid as much? Or merchandise?

The salary issue is driven from the fans, whether they go to the games or watch it on tv.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27297 posts
Posted on 8/30/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

No, but for creating the demand that drives such outrageous salaries


So what? Have you seen how much NBA players are making or Premier League soccer stars?
Doesn't bother me one way or another
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
5875 posts
Posted on 8/30/17 at 1:21 pm to

quote:

And what's behind the TV bucks? Fans. If not for fans, there would be no demand.


Except that the tv ratings are down, too. Fans simply aren't going to as many games or watching as many games. TV bucks come from advertisers, not viewers.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter