Started By
Message
re: French Attack thoughts..
Posted on 7/15/16 at 12:08 pm to Spaceman Spiff
Posted on 7/15/16 at 12:08 pm to Spaceman Spiff
I can't tell you for sure, but there was a large population in Munich when I was there.... Paris was absoutely loaded.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 12:12 pm to Peter Buck
...so why do shite to get themselves kicked out and promote nationalism? They are already winning local elections. Right now the tide is turning over there.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 12:18 pm to Peter Buck
quote:
...so why do shite to get themselves kicked out and promote nationalism? They are already winning local elections. Right now the tide is turning over there.
You are thinking logically like a member of Western civilization. You would have to immerse yourself within Muslim ideology to understand their motivations. Read the link I provided. Devote Muslims are damned if they do not fight/engage in jihad against infidels.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 12:31 pm to GurleyGirl
You mean to tell me that the same ones who put together complex operations like 9-11 are not smart enough to think strategically?
Posted on 7/15/16 at 12:46 pm to GurleyGirl
Disgusting news (that'll probably never be widely known) about the French Bataclan attack:
French lawmakers told Bataclan terrorists tortured, disemboweled victims
French lawmakers told Bataclan terrorists tortured, disemboweled victims
Posted on 7/15/16 at 1:00 pm to DragginFly
The thing with these people is that they only respect violence. All these hashtags of solidarity and prayers don't mean shite to them. The concept of that as a show of strength is a Western concept. They'll keep doing this forever.
At some point you have to consider excessive violence in response imo. Like the high casualty kind that people in the US have tried to avoid since Vietnam.
At some point you have to consider excessive violence in response imo. Like the high casualty kind that people in the US have tried to avoid since Vietnam.
Posted on 7/15/16 at 1:15 pm to Crowknowsbest
Overarching problem is the 21st Century Westernized mind is attempting to apply 21st Century logic to an issue that is driven by people who are in a 7th Century mindset. These jihadists believe they are fighting "Rome". Not Rome, Italy but the Roman Empire. This has been ebbing and flowing for over 1,400 years. We are going to have to do egregiously violent things of which the majority of Americans are not willing to do in order to truly put this thing away at least for a couple generations. However, if we manage to do that, it will more than likely be back again. They slither back into the shadows and regroup to attempt it again--eventually once they feel they are strong enough.
Posted on 7/16/16 at 11:06 am to Peter Buck
quote:
You mean to tell me that the same ones who put together complex operations like 9-11 are not smart enough to think strategically?
Pretty much. I don't think the concept of using commercial jets to crash into buildings in N.Y. City is particularly complex; our security was simply asleep at the wheel. Our immigration policy has been lax for many years and still is. You train some infiltrators as pilots well enough to navigate to N.Y. You hijack the jets and crash them into the 2 tallest structures in the city.
Posted on 7/16/16 at 11:24 am to Peter Buck
If you sell fire extinguishers you don't mind a few fires here and there.
Posted on 7/16/16 at 11:09 pm to Spaceman Spiff
quote:
I'd be willing to bet that there is a reason this administration is allowing so many refugees in without checking them
Bring in uneducated people, put them on the public dole, and eventually give them the right to vote. Guess what party they'll vote for for eternity. That was the main purpose of the Voting Rights Act and every program LBJ and Jimmy Carter got passed.
Posted on 7/17/16 at 3:33 pm to DragginFly
Posted on 7/17/16 at 3:57 pm to grey
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/17/16 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 7/17/16 at 4:45 pm to grey
Well, Snopes. Gotta be true.
Gotta love the Snopes wiki of the author of that article.
LINK
Gotta love the Snopes wiki of the author of that article.
LINK
quote:
Kim LaCapria is a New York-based content manager and longtime snopes.com message board participant. Although she was investigated and found to be "probably false" by snopes.com in early 2002, Kim later began writing for the site due to an executive order unilaterally passed by President Obama during a secret, late-night session (without the approval of Congress). Click like and share if you think this is an egregious example of legislative overreach.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News