Started By
Message
locked post

According To Palmer Mett is better then Murray

Posted on 9/20/13 at 7:14 pm
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49262 posts
Posted on 9/20/13 at 7:14 pm

Same with No Wallace and a slew of other QBs
Posted by drunkensailor89
Kingsland, GA
Member since Sep 2013
1964 posts
Posted on 9/20/13 at 8:09 pm to
Palmer is a pretty boy moron so I wouldn't expect him to make intelligent statements
Posted by Drudawg
The Ash
Member since Sep 2012
389 posts
Posted on 9/20/13 at 9:24 pm to
I was surprised he didn't even have him in his top 10.
Could be something to do with where he played?
Posted by Chef Leppard
Member since Sep 2011
11739 posts
Posted on 9/20/13 at 9:39 pm to
I agree with him for the most part
Posted by AmericusDawg
Member since Oct 2012
8577 posts
Posted on 9/20/13 at 11:52 pm to
The Ricky Martin part too?
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49262 posts
Posted on 9/20/13 at 11:53 pm to
Of course you do
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 9/20/13 at 11:57 pm to
In terms of the NFL, Mett is the better prospect actually.

Doesn't mean Murray isn't a legit player. No reason to be upset.
Posted by drunkensailor89
Kingsland, GA
Member since Sep 2013
1964 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 2:02 am to
Mett looks a lot better than I thought he would based onlast year, but more like I thought be would coming out of high school. I still reserve judgment for how he does the next couple of weeks. So far though he's been lights out.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58911 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 7:20 am to
quote:

n terms of the NFL, Mett is the better prospect actually.

Doesn't mean Murray isn't a legit player. No reason to be upset.





Not entirely certain I agree with you. He might have a better arm and have the height that is desired, but that does not make him a better prospect. If the draft were held today, I would be willing to bet Murray would be drafted higher. Now, if Mett shows that his performance over the first three games are legit, and not overblown statistics against inferior opponents, then he might develop INTO a better prospect. However, if he shows himself to be as inconsistent as he was last year, then.....

That said, if Mettenberger is a better prospect, then I would think LSU would want to take a close look at their QB coach, and ask why his performance has not measured up to his skills. Somebody is doing a poor job of development.


According to NFLDRAFTSCOUT.COM, Murray is alted to be drafted #93 while Mett is slated at #158.

SB Nation has Murray rated #11 QB and Mett at #14.

We can go on and on, but my point is there have been WAY too many QBs drafted with height and all the usually QB tools that have flopped because of what is between their ears. (Ryan Leaf, for example)

And there have been a few that looked like they could not make it because of some of these skills that have done well. (Brees, Tarkenton)

Only time will tell which does best in the NFL, but right now MOST NFL insiders still pick Murray to be drafted ahead of Mettenberger.
This post was edited on 9/21/13 at 7:40 am
Posted by samson'sseed
Augusta
Member since Aug 2013
2070 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 9:05 am to
He's better at sexual assault.
Posted by Remington Dawg
Irmo, S.C
Member since Sep 2012
1457 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 9:52 am to
Palmer is a talking bag of nut sweat! Complete D bag. He needs to go back and do the Bachelor #19.
Posted by RDDAWG
Member since Oct 2012
1010 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 10:12 am to
Well, in retrospect Mett was the favorite to start before Murray when he was here, this is before tittays became a distraction
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39994 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Well, in retrospect Mett was the favorite to start before Murray when he was here
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 10:38 am to
quote:

That said, if Mettenberger is a better prospect, then I would think LSU would want to take a close look at their QB coach, and ask why his performance has not measured up to his skills. Somebody is doing a poor job of development.


Yea, no shite. It's why we have a new OC.
Posted by PeeDeeDawgs
Florence SC
Member since Sep 2012
110 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 1:44 pm to
Mett beat Murray out as freshmen.... Remember...
Posted by bpatters69
South Florida... Gay-torville.
Member since Sep 2012
689 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 1:54 pm to
I would add "annoying" but yes, what you said.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58911 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 4:47 pm to
True. But almost every mock draft and NFL scout says Murray gets drafted higher than Mett. So, are you saying that NFL teams prefer to draft theworst prospect higher?
Posted by cantseefade1
Barzoom, Mars
Member since Mar 2013
638 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 4:51 pm to
Leaf is taller and had a bigger arm than Manning. The prototype QB people speak about doesn't exist. Certain physical requisites are required, but mobility, accuracy and intelligence will be the biggies going forward.
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36450 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

In terms of the NFL, Mett is the better prospect actually.

yeah, but this isnt the nfl so who gives a shite. stafford wasnt better than tebow in college
Posted by Chef Leppard
Member since Sep 2011
11739 posts
Posted on 9/21/13 at 9:40 pm to
Mett is throwing some great looking footballs tonight
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter