Started By
Message

re: South Carolina fans RE: 2014 class

Posted on 7/12/14 at 5:18 pm to
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
25662 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Whenever a coaching staff is willing to roll the dice on 36% of a class not qualifying then yes you are screwed. It reeks of desperation to sign that many borderline kids regardless of how talented they might be.


From your own site...
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
25662 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

ConwayGamecock
So they gotta retest & are not waiting on the NCAA Clearinghouse... big difference, logistically & timewise...
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39993 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

4 more are still waiting on test scores: Green, Lammons, and Smalls had to re-test and should know within 2-3 weeks, and Wideman is awaiting his test score result and should know in about a week...



What kind of tests are we talking?
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
25662 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

What kind of tests are we talking?
ACT is my understanding...
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37612 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:26 pm to
It was kind of strange how it all went down.

We sat with Blue's Mom and Brother at the Shrine Bowl and they admitted then that Joe was going to be cutting it very close.

Ritchie, we thought he was in better shape than Smalls but the test kicked his butt and after he lost ground on the second one they just decided to bite the bullet with him. He'll be back and wasn't a must have in this class.

Wideman we knew about, you're right.

Smalls, Green and Lammons ... those were definitely surprises. Although I'm keeping my fingers crossed that at least two out of those three enroll.

Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39993 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:34 pm to
They either have some low GPA or they are some struggling test takers.
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15737 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

So they gotta retest & are not waiting on the NCAA Clearinghouse... big difference, logistically & timewise...



Well Green, Lammons and Smalls ACT scores got flagged by the NCAA Clearinghouse either for going up or going down by a wide margin.

My understanding is that yesterday they retook the test in front of a proctor and if their scores are close enough to the ones that got flagged then they'll be allowed to enroll.

Should be about 2 weeks when we find out.
This post was edited on 7/12/14 at 7:24 pm
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

They either have some low GPA or they are some struggling test takers.



The reports I have seen say their ACT tests were HIGH, not low: high enough from previous test results that they got flagged, so they are taking the tests again. I guess the NCAA or USC - whoever is flagging these results - think they cheated to get the latest results as high as they were, or just are taking precautions. We'll see in about 2 weeks. Wideman's fate will be known this time next week, reportedly...
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39993 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

The reports I have seen say their ACT tests were HIGH, not low: high enough from previous test results that they got flagged, so they are taking the tests again. I guess the NCAA or USC - whoever is flagging these results - think they cheated to get the latest results as high as they were, or just are taking precautions
It's hard to raise your score more than a few points. If they scored more than 3-4 points higher it's going to get flagged.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37612 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

From your own site...


Mine own site? Huh?

Could I get a domain name or link or anything?
Posted by STUPIDFACE
Georgia
Member since Nov 2013
391 posts
Posted on 7/12/14 at 10:57 pm to
I'm confused. Didn't you guys only have like 4 seniors last year? Maybe 4 left early. So you had 8 or 9 roster spots open and you signed 21? Even with some transfers you couldn't have had but about 15 scholarships to give. Maybe your coaches already knew most of these guys weren't getting in.
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 1:49 am to
quote:

I'm confused. Didn't you guys only have like 4 seniors last year? Maybe 4 left early. So you had 8 or 9 roster spots open and you signed 21? Even with some transfers you couldn't have had but about 15 scholarships to give. Maybe your coaches already knew most of these guys weren't getting in.



We were on probation, so we only were allowed 82 total scholarships on the roster instead of 85...

Graduating Seniors:

Connor Shaw
Ronald Patrick
Jimmy Legree
Chaz Sutton


NFL-Bound Juniors:

Jadeveon Clowney
Kelcey Quarles
Victor Hampton
Bruce Ellington

Transfers from the program:

Mohammed Camara
Kyle Fleetwood
Bryce King
Jody Fuller
Kelvin Rainey
Kendric Salley
Kwinton Smith
Ronnie Martin
J.P. Vonashek

I may be missing 1 or 2 transfers, but that's 17 right there. Plus I think we didn't have a full 82, but rather 79 seems to be a number that jumps out to me. 79-17 = 62, so a class of 20 for 2014 sounds right, and yes it does seem that the staff knew about 1 or 2 commits not making it in with the rest of the class, like Sawyer who it was known that he might not have the grades even before he committed to USC.

So that may explain the class of 21, with perhaps Sawyer not expected to make it to campus this fall...
This post was edited on 7/13/14 at 1:52 am
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37612 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 8:45 am to
quote:

I'm confused. Didn't you guys only have like 4 seniors last year? Maybe 4 left early. So you had 8 or 9 roster spots open and you signed 21? Even with some transfers you couldn't have had but about 15 scholarships to give. Maybe your coaches already knew most of these guys weren't getting in.


You've got it right and Conway explained it well. The only thing he missed was this.

Our coaches actually figured as many as four might not qualify - which four I'm not sure. They may have had a specific four in mind and they may be surprised at what is happening right now, I:m sure they are.

But the part Conway missed is that they planned on having a few open schollies this year that they will fill with early enrollees from the 2015 class which is shaping-up very nicely and includes several high profile DBs.

It's going to all work-out in the end and we'll be loaded. This year, because we've been such a young team for the past few years, this year was not a crucial year to fill the roster .... except at CB where it could get interesting but we are in no way desperate. Plenty of teams go through this from time to time. We'll be fine.

One of our recruiting fortes, if you will, is helping kids turn their slack academic habits around. If we get them in we have a very good track record of getting them the help they need at The Dodie and turning them into productive young men. We've been doing this for years now. There have been other "close" years where it went down to the wire. This year has been somewhat magnified because of the increased attention on the program and the need at CB. CB may be tight this year, who knows, but we'll have a glutton at DB this time next year.

It happens to every program at one time or another at one position or another.

We'll probably play with a roster of 78-79 again this season, sign 28-29 in the next class, enroll 3-4 early and a full class of 25 the following summer ... this time next year.
Posted by SoGaFan
Member since Jan 2008
5956 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 9:03 am to
quote:

One of our recruiting fortes, if you will, is helping kids turn their slack academic habits around. If we get them in we have a very good track record of getting them the help they need at The Dodie and turning them into productive young men. We've been doing this for years now.


LOL. Tell me you didn't type this with a straight face. Read some of the studies conducted on what goes on with the academics of college athletes. For the schools willing to actually put their data out there, it is quite obvious that keeping less than stellar scholar athletes eligible has little to do with actually getting them a degree they could conceivably use.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37612 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 9:39 am to
quote:

LOL. Tell me you didn't type this with a straight face. Read some of the studies conducted on what goes on with the academics of college athletes. For the schools willing to actually put their data out there, it is quite obvious that keeping less than stellar scholar athletes eligible has little to do with actually getting them a degree they could conceivably use.


I'm sorry but ... wut?

Links to said studies or they didn't happen.

And with regard to "getting them degrees they could conceivably use," .... so what? What's your point? Did you really type that with a straight face?

How many graduates actually find work in their field of study anyway? I'm asking about all graduates, not just student athletes.

College degrees prove an ability to finish what you start. To develop and put into practice a plan for success and achieve specific goals. To illustrate a responsible lifestyle, one that is goal oriented and structured. The sheepskin itself, for all intentional purposes, is inconsequential. It's obtaining the degree that matters the most in all but a few fields of study.

What SCAR's academic assistance program is very good at doing, is teaching and developing strong life habits that are later put to good use after one's college days are a distant memory.

SCAR has an incredible high rate of post graduate job placement for their student athletes .... many of which were headed down the wrong path in life prior to joining our family. And we sell that when recruiting. Spurrier is fanatical about demanding full effort both on and off the field when a player agrees to play here. And we promise to support the effort through The Dodie Academic Facility.

But we'll look forward to the links to the studies you cited.
Posted by Warfarer
Dothan, AL
Member since May 2010
12125 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Yeah...our 2014 class was the highest average star rated class under Spurrier, but I started downgrading it once it became clear that Sawyer and Thomas weren't going to make it in.


This always made me laugh about people talking up Tuberville classes at Auburn. "Well but Auburn averaged a top 15 class for x amount of years under Tuberville while so-and-so averaged #y, you should win". Tuberville literally said that he would sign a kid knowing he couldn't make it in because he thought they needed a special signing day too. Our numbers were always badly skewed having at least 50% of our top 6 or 8 kids not make it in each year.

That said, with the limit on signees, taking a risk on positional needs is just not smart. Sawyer was a good risk as long he is a luxury signee and not counted in the number taken. You have to take a back up for the 95% chance he doesn't make it in.
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 7/13/14 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

This always made me laugh about people talking up Tuberville classes at Auburn. "Well but Auburn averaged a top 15 class for x amount of years under Tuberville while so-and-so averaged #y, you should win". Tuberville literally said that he would sign a kid knowing he couldn't make it in because he thought they needed a special signing day too. Our numbers were always badly skewed having at least 50% of our top 6 or 8 kids not make it in each year.

That said, with the limit on signees, taking a risk on positional needs is just not smart. Sawyer was a good risk as long he is a luxury signee and not counted in the number taken. You have to take a back up for the 95% chance he doesn't make it in.


Sawyer was a good risk because we'll ultimately get him in the 2015 class, as long as he does what he's supposed to do in JUCO. Jhaustin Thomas was thought to be a good risk because he is very talented and athletic, but he didn't take care of business, and now probably goes to a mid-major somewhere. Other than Ritchie, the others - if they fail their re-tests - look like prep school placements, and we'll get them into the program eventually.

USC has had at least 1 or 2 class commit casualties with every class, and yes some we offer knowing that they will go to JUCO, but with the intent of keeping them in the fold and getting them eventually. We only had 1 not make it in for the '13 cycle - DE Devante Covington. But we ultimately did not pursue him for this 2015 cycle...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter