Started By
Message

re: So let me get this straight. Re: UK's class

Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Top 5 class as of right now
Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:44 pm to
We're not cheating. We don't have enough money to pay football players with our basketball teams payroll.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

our basketball teams payroll.


good point
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112699 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:48 pm to
holy shite that's like pony express bad.
Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:49 pm to
It was a joke.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:49 pm to
what?
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112699 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:52 pm to
I thought you meant they really had a top 5 class. I couldn't remember how high they climbed according to catfan81 in the other thread.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I thought you meant they really had a top 5 class


They are top 5 as of right now LINK
This post was edited on 6/11/13 at 12:54 pm
Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:53 pm to
As of right now, we're #4 in the nation on Rivals and #6 on 247.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:53 pm to
composite #5
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105431 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:54 pm to
What is ridiculous about KY's class? How does it compare to Ole Miss class last year? Why did you let the trolls get to you?


Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:55 pm to
I was close enough.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:56 pm to
no you were right. on 247 alone you are #6 but the composite ranking you are #5
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40058 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:57 pm to
And they're not even in the top 20 when you go by averages.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:58 pm to
how do you mean? the composite ranking is the average ranking
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105431 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:58 pm to
Is that ranking more because of the number of commits or due to high ranking recruits? I can't access link due to blocks.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
40058 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 1:00 pm to
The players average star rankings (on rivals, which sucks, I know).
Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Is that ranking more because of the number of commits or due to high ranking recruits?


We have 15 commitments. Four 4* players, a lot of high 3* commitments.
Posted by CatFan81
Decatur, GA
Member since May 2009
47188 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

The players average star rankings (on rivals, which sucks, I know).


Meh. It's much better than ESPN and Scout.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

We have 15 commitments. Four 4* players, a lot of high 3* commitments.



This. I think Ware will be a 5* in the end and I see a few of these 3* moving on up to 4
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter