Started By
Message
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:00 pm to hawgfaninc
Wow this thread is going well
That pic is hilarious
That pic is hilarious
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:01 pm to Bear-O-Dactyl
Agreed- I didn't see lat's post to see what it said but I know the title wasn't anymore flamy than this pos thread.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:01 pm to cas4t
lol my thread did get whacked.
yet this one thrives.
:TD'ed:
yet this one thrives.
:TD'ed:
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:04 pm to piggilicious
idk how this thread is a flame?
These things actually happened
Lat posted an article from a UCLA site that anyone can give their opinion on. It was a UCLA writer/student (i believe) who is spewing a bunch of hearsay about Cam sitting next to the recruits on a plane as well as staying in the same hotel.
Those things aren't confirmed and the article was full of bias and hearsay.
These things actually happened
Lat posted an article from a UCLA site that anyone can give their opinion on. It was a UCLA writer/student (i believe) who is spewing a bunch of hearsay about Cam sitting next to the recruits on a plane as well as staying in the same hotel.
Those things aren't confirmed and the article was full of bias and hearsay.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:05 pm to cas4t
give me a break, both could be considered hearsay, you know damn well why mine was whacked. don't be a homer
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:07 pm to cas4t
The title is a flame in itself- then you have fatEd or whatever his name is calling Bert basically every derogatory name in the book. Pretty flamy IMO.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:07 pm to Latarian
quote:
both could be considered hearsay
debatable
quote:
you know damn well why mine was whacked
I do. Because it was a basically a flame article in which the author tried to make hearsay sound factual.
quote:
don't be a homer
bro I'll always be a homer.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:08 pm to piggilicious
I mean hell at least I linked an article, OP just quoted shite, as if that assures us it's verbatim
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:09 pm to Latarian
Well that is a fair point.
But you basically linked us to UCLArant.
But you basically linked us to UCLArant.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:14 pm to Latarian
I was referring to the author.
ya know, TD LSU fans are very biased.
Tidefans posters are very biased.
etc
How the hell could he know that Cam sat next to him on a flight or that he was staying in the same hotel? There is literally no way to know that unless you knew someone on the flight, and someone at the hotel.
ya know, TD LSU fans are very biased.
Tidefans posters are very biased.
etc
How the hell could he know that Cam sat next to him on a flight or that he was staying in the same hotel? There is literally no way to know that unless you knew someone on the flight, and someone at the hotel.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:15 pm to cas4t
makes no sense for it to fly on the Rant not here. oh well, that's why I rarely post on this board, not as much fun.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:16 pm to cas4t
better question: why would someone make that up? if it were untrue would be easy to refute by LSU
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:16 pm to Latarian
it was posted on SECr?
I saw it on the TR, but it was in a thread to basically show how ridiculous the UCLA author was being.
I saw it on the TR, but it was in a thread to basically show how ridiculous the UCLA author was being.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:18 pm to cas4t
I'm saying something that portrays LSU in a negative light doesn't get whacked with the quickness on the Rant but does here.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 1/31/14 at 4:19 pm to Latarian
on the TR?
or on the SECr?
It makes sense to let LSU fans talk shite about LSU
or on the SECr?
It makes sense to let LSU fans talk shite about LSU
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News