Started By
Message
Posted on 11/16/11 at 11:47 am to Alahunter
I think it could have went either way..
pretty close..
It will probly be talked about for years.. just like the PP7 Int..
Posted on 11/16/11 at 11:56 am to taylormade
quote:
It will probly be talked about for years.. just like the PP7 Int..
Let's hope the partial Gump wife gives as good as she got for the endless whining, kvetching, bellyaching, "dressing in sack cloth and heaping ashes on his head" drama over the PP call. Something has to be done to balance the karmic rip in timespace caused by the incessant insect whine from BR over a ref call.
Posted on 11/16/11 at 11:59 am to ChemicalXen
quote:This is correct, but there was one in 09.
No pick in '10. Pick in '11.
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:03 pm to arlo
quote:
Let's hope the partial Gump wife gives as good as she got for the endless whining, kvetching, bellyaching, "dressing in sack cloth and heaping ashes on his head" drama over the PP call. Something has to be done to balance the karmic rip in timespace caused by the incessant insect whine from BR over a ref call.
Sour subject? FWIW I have never brought up the 09 game to them.
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:06 pm to TIGER62
quote:
the difference in the two is that they got reid's right and the conference office backs it up , but pp7 int. was - no comment by the office - which makes me believe that the game call was wrong, they should have owned up - we all make mistakes!
Exactly
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:11 pm to Ray Ray Rodman
Maybe the reason I never bring it up to them is that they give me a ticket to the game every year its in Tuscaloosa.
They are good people, I just think the sting over the loss was a little too much this year.
They are good people, I just think the sting over the loss was a little too much this year.
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:13 pm to Anothertig
quote:at least they're admitting the PP7 play was a bad call...
All I have been hearing from them since the game is that Reid's interception was just as bad of a call as PP7's was in 09.
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:21 pm to Anothertig
They were the same per the SEC Office.
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:24 pm to Anothertig
quote:
I do wish I had a partial wife from time to time though.
Upper half or lower half...........
or just the middle half?
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:26 pm to Silverback
No it couldn't have. It was clearly an interception.
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:28 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Upper half or lower half...........
If i could choose it would be from V to Ts
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:45 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Both were the right call
right, PP being way in bounds with 2 feet was the right call as far as calling incomplete.
Posted on 11/16/11 at 12:56 pm to Alahunter
I talked to some hardcore Bama fans yesterday who pick up things from where I work. Hardcore as in Bama Magnets and stickers ALL OVER their Truck.
He said it was a pick but that they only showed ONE replay of the pick on the Jumbo Screen. They wouldn't show any more so they all thought it was bullshite until they got home and started looking for YouTube clips.
He said he thinks they only showed one replay at the game to keep the crowd in it, said it worked to. Everyone got louder.....well at least until OT.
Posted on 11/16/11 at 3:19 pm to Anothertig
In 2009, PP7 did not intercept the ball because he only got ONE foot in bounds...
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News