Started By
Message
re: Wonder what the simulater thinks about the Bama/AU matchup
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:44 pm to WDChizik
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:44 pm to WDChizik
quote:
If you really think anybody in the NCAA could hold Cam MF Newton to 9 points, you've been smoking too much kush.
If Mark Barron's pec muscle isn't hanging off his chest and he makes the interception of a horribly thrown ball then Auburn doesn't get to 10 points.
1
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:45 pm to deaux68
quote:
If Mark Barron's pec muscle isn't hanging off his chest and he makes the interception of a horribly thrown ball then Auburn doesn't get to 10 points.
Shoulda had someone on the field who had a good pec muscle then.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:46 pm to Lee County Tiger
He would have had a pec muscle if Emory Blake didn't blow by him, making him look like a clown. That's his own fault.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:50 pm to deaux68
Just to make you feel better I simulated it 5 more times all on a neutral field.
Bama wins 50-7
Bama wins 55-10
Bama wins 36-21
Bama wins 36-3
Bama wins 41-16
This means absolutely nothing, but I didn't want y'all to think I simulated a million times to get that crazy score. Matter of fact, I wouldn't have even said anything if hadn't been so bad.
At least we now have an unbiased source telling us how stupid some of you people are though.
Bama wins 50-7
Bama wins 55-10
Bama wins 36-21
Bama wins 36-3
Bama wins 41-16
This means absolutely nothing, but I didn't want y'all to think I simulated a million times to get that crazy score. Matter of fact, I wouldn't have even said anything if hadn't been so bad.
At least we now have an unbiased source telling us how stupid some of you people are though.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:52 pm to deaux68
quote:
At least we now have an unbiased source telling us how stupid some of you people are though.
You've simulated a hypothetical game multiple times on a video game, in an effort to prove your team would have won... and everyone else is stupid?
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:54 pm to deaux68
quote:unbiased =/= accurate. FTR, I don't really know or care who would win. Very well could be 09 Bama. But any simulator that has Davis Hooper scoring the first TD of the game has some issues when analyzing its reliability for predicting IRL scenarios.
unbiased source
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:54 pm to deaux68
So is the lesson to be learned from this thread that Bama fans have to resort to online fantasy simulators to beat Auburn?
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:55 pm to NIH
sorry that your team fumbles a lot.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 2:55 pm to cameronml
quote:This sentence could be completed any number of ways and still be accurate.
Bama fans have to resort to online fantasy simulators to
Posted on 12/18/10 at 3:01 pm to Stanky Legg
quote:
and everyone else is stupid?
It's about as stupid as comparing the two in the first place.
Anybody not flaming or wearing orange and blue glasses knows that last years Bama team was light years better than this Auburn team.
Posted on 12/18/10 at 3:06 pm to deaux68
quote:Reading this thread and then your sig quote made me laugh.
deaux68
Posted on 12/18/10 at 3:08 pm to TheSandman
Yeah, I'm starting to believe there is some kind of special "bammer" algorithm placed within this simulator's code.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News