Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Winning SEC East > Winning b12?

Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:33 pm
Posted by Ridgewalker
Member since Aug 2012
3566 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:33 pm
I've been thinking on this one for a while and believe winning the SEC East carries more weight than winning the b12 outright.

What say you?

Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42573 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:34 pm to
Wait until you see the crowd Sat.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:35 pm to
I cain't wait!
Posted by JermStone
Beaumont, Tx
Member since Jun 2008
5741 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Winning SEC East > Winning b12?


Well fricking Duh!

unless you like bcs bowls then it's big 12 and their automatic bid over sec east
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49331 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:38 pm to
Probably if only Tennessee's turf didn't suck
Posted by SpunkInPublic
Dallas
Member since Sep 2013
52 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:40 pm to
Mizzou never won the big 12.

Won the Sec East in year 2.

Winning SEC east much tougher than winning big 12.
Posted by Bogie00
Tiger in Kansas
Member since Apr 2012
5704 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:51 pm to
Winning the division, doesn't carry more weight.....but probably more of a thrill!.

Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86548 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Winning SEC East > Winning b12?


so where should UGA 2011 and 2012 have ended up?
Posted by LSUROCKS52
Rest in Peace
Member since Oct 2003
56 posts
Posted on 12/2/13 at 12:53 pm to
at this point it's definitely more impressive to win the SEC east
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter