Started By
Message
re: Will Jeremy Hill dominate in the NFL?
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:01 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:01 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Enough size to break average tackle and enough speed to keep distance from a chasing defender.... I think it was a good choice for him to come out while his stock was high.
0
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:01 am to lsupride87
quote:
Sorry, he is 6.2 for his career. That is dominant. Herschel averaged 5.3 for his career. I guess he wasnt dominant either?
Both were dominant. I said Hill was dominate...
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:01 am to AUsteriskPride
quote:+1
The guy had over 1,000 last year in Loeffler's offense. The offense doesn't change the patience at the LOS, vision, or shiftiness.
Tre will be very good in the pro's IMO.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:02 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:Yeh not directing it towards you. I want davesdawgs to take note
Both were dominant. I said Hill was dominate...
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:17 am to CrimsonChin
Ready to see this kid bruise it up @ 6'2", 235....nasty.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:31 am to davesdawgs
quote:
He could behind a stud OL but you can say that of a lot of good RB's. Hill didn't exactly dominate in college football
There is an amazing amount of ignorance in this sentence and a half.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:33 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
He'll make a lot of teams better.
Would love to see him get picked up by the Saints somehow
maybe in some type of trade situation involving Ingram
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:40 am to cas4t
Would be a good fit on the lions to help take some pressure off Stafford. Him/Bush are a good 1-2 punch with different styles.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:42 am to CrimsonChin
It is so hard to tell until they have a season or two to play anymore. I thought Richardson would be a beast in the NFL and he has been a complete flop. Others you think won't amount to much or minimal production become stars. 
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:42 am to CrimsonChin
Not dominate. Only a few players can really be considered to be dominant in the league. He'll be a very good pro back though.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:43 am to cas4t
quote:
Would love to see him get picked up by the Saints somehow
Dear Lord please let this happen. The melt will be glorious.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:51 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
I thought Richardson would be a beast in the NFL and he has been a complete flop. Others you think won't amount to much or minimal production become stars.
I always thought Lacy would have the much better NFL career than Richardson. TR depended a lot on just being stronger than everyone else. That shite only gets you so far. Vision is the #1 tool needed by RBs in the NFL. It's what makes Marshawn Lynch and AP really elite.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:54 am to CrimsonChin
Jeremy Hill could probably get away with a less than stellar offensive line, whereas Mason will probably need a better one to be productive.
Both will be good if put into the right systems/coordinators. I think both have room to grow, too.
Both will be good if put into the right systems/coordinators. I think both have room to grow, too.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:55 am to GooseSix
quote:
Dear Lord please let this happen. The melt will be glorious.
who would melt?
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:57 am to RB10
quote:
There is an amazing amount of ignorance in this sentence
Posted on 1/20/14 at 10:59 am to davesdawgs
You should maybe consider looking at his stats.
Then also take notice that he put those numbers up while being 1 of 3 RBs.
Then come back and post some more.
Then also take notice that he put those numbers up while being 1 of 3 RBs.
Then come back and post some more.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 11:07 am to cas4t
He reminds me a lot of Arian Foster. Size, running style, etc.
Hopefully he is just as successful but avoids injuries.
Hopefully he is just as successful but avoids injuries.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 11:15 am to TXTIGER2
quote:
Ask South Carolina, A&M, & Auburn about his break-away speed. Not saying it will automatically translate to the NFL, but he definitely has more break-away speed than Lacy or Richardson.
Seriously. Don't think he has ever been caught from behind at any level of organized football.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 11:22 am to FamousAmos
Richardson ran a 4.47 was it at Pro Day, and he wasn't near 100%. He looks slow in the NFL because he's dancing and literally stopping in the backfield.
Posted on 1/20/14 at 11:59 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
He looks slow in the NFL because he's dancing and literally stopping in the backfield.
Because his vision is shite. He is used to just being able to be more athletic and stronger than everyone else while also having the best Oline ever.
In the NFL you have to create your own space and follow your blocks. And you can't hesitate.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News