Started By
Message
re: Will Auburn do this to Oregon?
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:03 pm to Eagle Of War AU
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:03 pm to Eagle Of War AU
close game that will come down to turnovers and the LOS battle.
i know, i know, pretty much a good guess in ANY football game. but somehow VERNE LUNDQUIST gets paid for this shiite.
i know, i know, pretty much a good guess in ANY football game. but somehow VERNE LUNDQUIST gets paid for this shiite.
This post was edited on 12/25/10 at 1:04 pm
0
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:06 pm to colemab
quote:
"I thought I saw the ball move" is exactly what the CBS announcer said.
OK????? That proves nothing.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:09 pm to HogKing111
I have always pulled for the SEC team in the Championship in being an LSU man.
But this year, I hope that Auburn gets rolled by the Ducks.
But this year, I hope that Auburn gets rolled by the Ducks.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:14 pm to HogKing111
quote:
OK????? That proves nothing.
LOL, I hear you ignoring the 3rd party evaluations that don't agree with your point of view.
The fact is that the line judge ruled /thought Stephens hand was under his knee and that the ball came out before the other knee came down.
We all have good and bad calls in the SEC. Just the facts of life.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:18 pm to toomersdrugs
Many of your recent posts say otherwise.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:22 pm to RedElephants
quote:
RedElephants
Will Auburn do this to Oregon?
It's funny how like every Auburn fan thinks the Oregon game will be a cakewalk...
Well it was a question and its clear you have no problem with hyperbole. You got your Alabama script a Oregon shirt yet? Because those are about as cool as aids.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:23 pm to colemab
quote:
LOL, I hear you ignoring the 3rd party evaluations that don't agree with your point of view.
You're relying on your memory of an announcer stating what he thought he saw. I'm not ignoring it, just not giving it the same weight as this picture which clearly tells the story. Go ahead, turn your head, I know it hurts.
It's funny you think one hand under a knee means that no other part of Green was down, when it's clear most of his lower body is on the ground with the ball securely tucked in his arm.
Auburn fans, just like their coaches and players, have lost all credibility. It's laughable you think you have a leg to stand on when it comes to evidence and fairness.
This post was edited on 12/25/10 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:27 pm to HogKing111
quote:
HogKing111
Look forward not backwards, whininig doesn't suit you well.
28 points give to auburn? This is starting to sound like a fish story. Will it be 35 by kickoff next year? Where in the hell do you get that "tge refs gave auburn 28 points?"
This post was edited on 12/25/10 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 12/25/10 at 2:04 pm to piggidyphish
The refs gave Auburn 14 points, and these missed calls were likely 28 point swings in the game b/c the calls were either Auburn TD or Arkansas ball (if the calls had been Arkansas's ball like it should have been, Arkansas likely scores. So it goes from +7 Arkansas, to +7 Auburn, which is a 14 point swing for each call).
Posted on 12/25/10 at 2:56 pm to HogKing111
quote:
You're relying on your memory of an announcer stating what he thought he saw.
Negative Ghost Rider. I have the game in HD and I went back and watched the segment in question. So lets be clear this isn't from my memory.
quote:
It's funny you think one hand under a knee means that no other part of Green was down, when it's clear most of his lower body is on the ground with the ball securely tucked in his arm.
I love how you point to one frame from the video. There is a reason the review booth uses full motion video instead of just individual frames. If you watch the multiple video replays, you can see the ball bobble before he totally loses it or comes down. You can't exactly see this lack of possession in a single frame.
Looking at your screen shot - because of the way his body is bent, his left knee is facing up and clearly not in contact with the ground like his left heel is.
Then his right knee hits Stephens hand before the ground (check out the other angle reply NOT in the screen shot below), that is how the review booth couldn't over turn the call on the field.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 5:38 pm to Eagle Of War AU
that bitch is fine. IWHI fo sho
Posted on 12/25/10 at 5:48 pm to RedElephants
quote:
It's funny how like every Auburn fan thinks the Oregon game will be a cakewalk...
It's going to be. Auburn is going to beat the shite out of Oregon and it is going to be embarrassing.
After Oregons first offensive series the QB will come to the sidelines and tell the coaches he has no idea what Auburn is doing out there and the coaches will say neither do we.
The defense will be completely different and something that Oregon hasn't seen all year, even from the film they watch on Auburn. Oregon has not faced a team that is even as good as about 6 teams that Auburn beat this year and they have not seen anything defensively that is close to what they will see when they play Auburn.
I hate Auburn during the year but this one is us (SEC) against an outsider and I have to pull for Auburn to beat the shite out of Oregon and they are going to. This game will be out of reach for Oregon at halftime and the world will know it, even the Oregon fans.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 5:55 pm to colemab
quote:
colemab
Yeah, I have it recorded in high def also. It was a really close call but it does look like he was not down (call me a homer or WTF ever). The shot where his hand is under his knee is more telling because you can see the ball loose but thats why they wont post that pic. I'm not gonna waste time taking a pic and loading it on my comp just to please someone who is obviously still butthurt
BTW... Saying Arky would've DEF scored is pointless. How does anyone know? They turned the ball over a few times, who's to say he wouldn't have fumbled the very next play? or Fairley wouldn't have busted thru and caused a bad pass? It's just easier for them to say
"but the refs".Posted on 12/25/10 at 6:08 pm to Eagle Of War AU
quote:
Yeah, I have it recorded in high def also. It was a really close call but it does look like he was not down (call me a homer or WTF ever). The shot where his hand is under his knee is more telling because you can see the ball loose but thats why they wont post that pic. I'm not gonna waste time taking a pic and loading it on my comp just to please someone who is obviously still butthurt
BTW... Saying Arky would've DEF scored is pointless. How does anyone know? They turned the ball over a few times, who's to say he wouldn't have fumbled the very next play? or Fairley wouldn't have busted thru and caused a bad pass? It's just easier for them to say "but the refs".
LINK
Pause it @ 1:16. He has the ball, his butt is down. End of story.
How do I know we would have scored? B/c we scored on you all damn game, until we got behind in the 4th and your D knew we had to pass.
Before that BS call, yall were up by one point and we were marching with the ball with 9 minutes left in the 4th. That blown call put yall up by 8, when you shouldn't have even had the lead in the first place due to the blown call in the first half.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 6:17 pm to HogKing111
quote:
his butt is down
His butt is on Blanc's leg.
This post was edited on 12/25/10 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 12/25/10 at 6:19 pm to mckibaj
quote:
His butt is on Blanc's leg.
I guess I should be more specific. His right upper thigh is down.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 6:22 pm to HogKing111
quote:
I guess I should be more specific. His right upper thigh is down.
I just think that it is too close to call. If the refs would have called him down then they would not have reversed that either.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 6:23 pm to HogKing111
quote:
* = Team was given a 28 point swing by the ref's in the Arkansas game.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 6:26 pm to mckibaj
quote:
I just think that it is too close to call. If the refs would have called him down then they would not have reversed that either.
Also look at 1:46. His right knee is down.
I agree that it's a tough call to make in live action, but I think it could have been overturned.
The fumble in the first half could not have been overturned no matter what the call was. But it was BS that for that fumble, the official with the best view tossed his bean bag, no one signaled TD, and then the official on the other side runs in and changes the initial ruling. To this day no one can definitively say that ball ever crossed the goaline.
28 point swing. Cam's ineligible. = *'s for Auburn!
Posted on 12/25/10 at 6:27 pm to HogKing111
quote:
Cammie's Man Juice.
It's actually Cammy Cam Juice
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News