Started By
Message
Why does the media talk up first-year head coaches going into their second year?
Posted on 7/23/22 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 7/23/22 at 7:08 pm
It's nauseating seeing the media this offseason acting like Shane Beamer is the second-coming of christ for going 7-6 and almost losing to Vanderbilt.
I like Beamer and all but what the frick man
I know it's the media we're talking about here but god it feels like they're getting more and more ridiculous with their "predictions" for these coaches that only have 1 year under their belt.
Are there any other head coaches that get this treatment after the first year?
I like Beamer and all but what the frick man
I know it's the media we're talking about here but god it feels like they're getting more and more ridiculous with their "predictions" for these coaches that only have 1 year under their belt. Are there any other head coaches that get this treatment after the first year?
This post was edited on 7/23/22 at 7:14 pm
5
Posted on 7/23/22 at 7:09 pm to Rescue22
ok
Posted on 7/23/22 at 7:11 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
ok
Riveting
Posted on 7/23/22 at 7:12 pm to Rescue22
Most coaches show you what they have by year two. They usually have "their" way in by year 2.
Posted on 7/23/22 at 7:27 pm to Rescue22
quote:
Are there any other head coaches that get this treatment after the first year?
He is one that Kelly @ LSU doesn't have his team pre-ranked while on the other hand Freeman @ ND has his team pre-ranked in the top 10! He has never been a HC before!
Then another one Rile @ USC pre-ranked in the top 25. This post was edited on 7/23/22 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 7/23/22 at 7:32 pm to Rescue22
“They say I have really pretty eyes but I just don’t see it. What do you think?”
Posted on 7/23/22 at 7:52 pm to Rescue22
Bob Stoops ruined it for future 2nd year HCs.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News