Started By
Message

re: Who would you rather have at safety?

Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:28 pm to
Posted by mikrit54
Robeline
Member since Oct 2013
8664 posts
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:28 pm to
A&M at safety.


Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24386 posts
Posted on 4/14/15 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Mills had more combines tackles. Watts has more solo tackles meaning he is having to tackle in space, most likely meaning the play got past the second level. To dumb it down for you, big plays aren't good. Mills had more combines tackles which suggests tackles at the second level with linebackers. To dumb it down for you again, shorter plays are better than longer plays. Understand now you dumb frick?


Talking to Aggy about defense is as bad as talking to us about QB play.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37516 posts
Posted on 4/14/15 at 4:16 pm to
I'll take 10 extra solo tackles in a bad defensive scheme and 3 ints all day over a safety who stands around and doesn't make plays on balls in the air.
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24386 posts
Posted on 4/14/15 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I'll take 10 extra solo tackles in a bad defensive scheme and 3 ints all day over a safety who stands around and doesn't make plays on balls in the air.



Bless your heart.
Posted by RagingCajun3195
Fort Worth
Member since Aug 2014
2013 posts
Posted on 4/14/15 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

texag7


So let's hypothetically say that teams are willing to let it loose and throw on LSUs secondary, and that our defense is in fact on the field for 40 rather than 20-25 minutes a game, I think it's safe to say throughout the season Mills would have at least matched Watts number of pass breakups and picks.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter