Started By
Message
re: Who in SEC has the most losing seasons since World War 2
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:20 pm to ksayetiger
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:20 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
why not do since WWI?
Why not do all-time?
1
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:21 pm to TabledTiger
Curly was a damn idiot. Lou Tepper and his bend but don't break defense was another nightmare. Basically if you take out the 90's we look a hell of a lot better
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:21 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
You left off one other thing that happened about that time.
I'll let you use this site to help you figure it out. Would have used an AU site if there was one, the results would be similar.
Integration happened later in the South, though. There were black players in the CFB hall of fame before the SEC integrated. I guess you could say that complete integration happened around that time period.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:42 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Why not do all-time?
Go ahead. Some teams in the SEC started 15 years before others. Some of the seasons in the late 1800s teams only played 1 or 2 games. Some teams were playing high schools so it doesnt get consistent until around the 1920s.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:49 pm to hogminer
quote:
Some teams in the SEC started 15 years before others. Some of the seasons in the late 1800s teams only played 1 or 2 games
This still does not diminish the number of winning seasons for a particular university. It is not their fault some universities didn't start football at the same time. Also you really think it would be fair to just throw out all the records every time a new university is formed. If that's the case then any season before USF started their football program is irrelevant.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:54 pm to LSUNV
quote:
This still does not diminish the number of winning seasons for a particular university. It is not their fault some universities didn't start football at the same time. Also you really think it would be fair to just throw out all the records every time a new university is formed. If that's the case then any season before USF started their football program is irrelevant.
this is about SEC teams, not teams in whatever conference USF is in
and WW2 is the best starting spot for the data in the OP for the SEC. sorry you can't deal with it?
Posted on 7/2/14 at 1:02 pm to LSUNV
quote:
If that's the case then any season before USF started their football program is irrelevant.
You're dense
Posted on 7/2/14 at 1:08 pm to Phat Phil
quote:
Tennessee would be #1 if it wasn't for Derek Dooley
And Alabama would be #1 without the Mikes.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 3:07 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
15 Arkansas
big Sis
This post was edited on 7/2/14 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 7/2/14 at 3:12 pm to hogminer
came into this thread expecting much worse
Posted on 7/2/14 at 3:36 pm to AaronDeTiger
Y'all dumb. But I love you anyways. ROLL TIDE!!
Posted on 7/2/14 at 3:40 pm to DBama1
How bout since 92?
Posted on 7/2/14 at 4:17 pm to STUPIDFACE
quote:
How bout since 92?
Vandy 19
UK 14
Mizzou 11
MSU 10
Arky 9
Ole Miss 8*
SCar 8
Bama 7*
UT 6
LSU 5
AU 4
TAMU 4
UGa 3
UF 1
(* Denotes records affected by NCAA sanctions against Bama in '93 and '05-07)
Posted on 7/2/14 at 5:05 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:]
How bout since 92?[/quote
[quote]Vandy 19
UK 14
Mizzou 11
MSU 10
Arky 9
Ole Miss 8*
SCar 8
Bama 7*
UT 6
LSU 5
AU 4
TAMU 4
UGa 3
UF 1
Posted on 7/2/14 at 5:30 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
and WW2 is the best starting spot for the data in the OP for the SEC. sorry you can't deal with it?
Sometimes you fricktards respond without reading. First off I was not talking to you dipshit and secondly all-time records is the only records that count. Everybody that matters thinks so to
Posted on 7/2/14 at 5:33 pm to TigerMeister
quote:
poor State
Hey, not last
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News