Started By
Message
re: Who are the two teams you definitely don't want in the SEC?
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:37 pm to AgroAmerican
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:37 pm to AgroAmerican
Can I expand it to 4?
Missouri
ARKANSAS
USC
TAMU
in that order. Go back to tradition and go back to 10 teams.
Missouri
ARKANSAS
USC
TAMU
in that order. Go back to tradition and go back to 10 teams.
0
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:37 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Oklahoma/tu.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:40 pm to AgroAmerican
quote:
y'all are newbs too, we actually belong
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:40 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Oklahoma/tu.
quote:
Texas A&M Fan
Conflict of interests.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:40 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Arky and Mizzou
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:42 pm to AgroAmerican
quote:
y'all are newbs too, we actually belong and bring something to the table besides married siblings.
I actually like having aTm in the fold. Mizzou on the other hand, I wonder if we can talk the B1G into taking them?
I definitely don't want OKST, Texas Tech, Kansas, Miami, NCST or UL in the league.
I'd actually love to see Texas and/or Oklahoma in the SEC. I know they don't offer much (although OU does offer the smaller OK markets). But they would have to agree to play by our rules. I'd also be ok with FSU & Clemson even though they don't add new markets. But we will get stuck with some combination of UNC, NCST, Duke, VT, or UVA. I'm OK with UNC, UVA, VT, and maybe Duke. But I don't want NCST.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:43 pm to Bamatab
Duke and Texas
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:44 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Oklahoma/tu.
Agreed, and I think it should also be pointed out that this is your first post I've seen in a long time not designed to rile somebody up for no reason. Well done
I know BB fans would like to see NC & Duke. NC I can see, but Duke - that just makes no sense to me. I'm not sure what others have against VT. Of the candidates mentioned they'd be my first choice. But I'm also not sure why so many see 16 as inevitable.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:46 pm to TeLeFaWx
I actually wouldn't mind OU.
But Texas, frick Texas.
But Texas, frick Texas.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:48 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Mizzou and Miami.
I want Louisville and Clemson
I want Louisville and Clemson
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:51 pm to finestfirst79
quote:
NC I can see, but Duke - that just makes no sense to me. I'm not sure what others have against VT.
I think most feel that UNC and VT won't be coming together. It'll either be UNC & Duke, or VT & NCST. In that scenario, I'd go with UNC & Duke. Now UNC and UVA would be the sure fire first choice, but I don't see UVA wanting to come.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:53 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
VT and Duke
Posted on 4/9/13 at 3:56 pm to Crowknowsbest
WVU and Miami
Posted on 4/9/13 at 4:00 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Georgia Tech
Florida State
Florida State
Posted on 4/9/13 at 4:01 pm to djackson1892
quote:
Well it's gonna hurt even more in 2013 when your shite is pushed in again.
Very weird way to talk s***... You are going to have butt*** with them???
Posted on 4/9/13 at 4:03 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Missouri
Missouri
Missouri
Posted on 4/9/13 at 4:04 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
NC State
Clemson
Clemson
This post was edited on 4/9/13 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 4/9/13 at 4:05 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:what does it mean?
Keep it real no Notre Dame, Rutgers or British Columbia Lions answer.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 4:07 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Dook sucks.
Anybody not in Virgina or North Carolina sucks. After that, this is my pecking order:
1. North Carolina -- way too many fans to ignore
2. Virginia Tech -- hell, they fit right in NOW
3. Virginia -- too much history and notoriety to ignore, but they have GOT to step up the commitment to athletics.
4. NC State -- They are only #4 because they are not nearly the national brand as NC, and could easily be #3 with their better commitment to athletics.
Anybody not in Virgina or North Carolina sucks. After that, this is my pecking order:
1. North Carolina -- way too many fans to ignore
2. Virginia Tech -- hell, they fit right in NOW
3. Virginia -- too much history and notoriety to ignore, but they have GOT to step up the commitment to athletics.
4. NC State -- They are only #4 because they are not nearly the national brand as NC, and could easily be #3 with their better commitment to athletics.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 4:23 pm to KaiserSoze99
Honestly, any more private schools.
We already have our one and only one is needed to shield inter-conference communication from FOIA.
We already have our one and only one is needed to shield inter-conference communication from FOIA.
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News