Started By
Message
re: Which SECW team starting a new QB is in the best shape position wise?
Posted on 1/30/14 at 2:57 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Posted on 1/30/14 at 2:57 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Bless your little aggy heart.
1
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:00 pm to wadewilson
He tweeted he was "eliminating" us right after Allen committed. Pretty obvious what went on, he even said it himself
LINK
LINK
quote:
Just a few weeks ago, Parkway (LA) quarterback Brandon Harris announced his top seven, which included Texas A&M. But after the Aggies landed a commitment from five-star Desert Mountain (Ariz.) signal caller Kyle Allen on Monday, Harris, considered by many as the nation’s top dual-threat quarterback, took to twitter to announce that he will no longer be ‘pursuing’ Texas A&M. Here is the full note: “I would like to wish Texas A&M the best of luck in the future, as they received a fantastic quarterback in Kyle Allen. I will no longer be pursuing Texas A&M anymore as this recruiting process goes along, best of luck this upcoming season and the future will write itself! #godbless Brandon Harris!”
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:01 pm to parkjas2001
State
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:01 pm to wadewilson
quote:
I didn't realize 1 full game and 1 drive have shown the ceiling of his ability.
They didn't but the statement made implied that Jennings had proven himself and Coker had not. Coker will have arguably the best best backfield in the country and one of the best receiving corps in college football to work with, so even if he is not any better than Jennings I still expect him to be much better.
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:02 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
He tweeted he was "eliminating" us right after Allen committed. Pretty obvious what went on, he even said it himself
So just because he eliminated aTm after they signed another QB means he "wanted to be an Aggie so badly" to you?
ETA: No where in that link does he even come close to implying that he really wanted to go to aTm.
This post was edited on 1/30/14 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:03 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Oh lord, how did he survive without A&M being in his top 6?
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:04 pm to RB10
Did he tweet thanks to any other schools he was considering and offer effusive praise to their QB commits?
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:04 pm to BamaDoc14
quote:
They didn't but the statement made implied that Jennings had proven himself and Coker had not. Coker will have arguably the best best backfield in the country and one of the best receiving corps in college football to work with, so even if he is not any better than Jennings I still expect him to be much better.
Reasonable people can disagree on the 2, but FWIW, the 1 start Jennings has was against a top ten defense. I'm a little bothered that he didn't have more success throwing the ball, but he didn't need to with Hill going HAM.
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:05 pm to RB10
quote:
So just because he eliminated aTm after they signed another QB means he "wanted to be an Aggie so badly" to you?
That's exactly what it means. LSU gets our offensive scraps and you know it.
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:05 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Did he tweet thanks to any other schools he was considering and offer effusive praise to their QB commits?
I dunno, I don't follow teenagers on twitter.
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:05 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Did he tweet thanks to any other schools he was considering and offer effusive praise to their QB commits?
Did any of the other schools he was considering sign another top rated QB before him?
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:06 pm to RB10
quote:
Did any of the other schools he was considering sign another top rated QB before him?
Exactly
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:07 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Exactly
This proves nothing. You claim he wanted to be an Aggie, yet your only proof is he thanked the school for their consideration after eliminating them.
This post was edited on 1/30/14 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:08 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
LSU gets our offensive scraps and you know it.
Yep. aTm passed on the #1 player in the nation too, I guess.
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:08 pm to RB10
We eliminated him when we signed another 5* QB. He would've been an Aggie if we'd have wanted him.
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:09 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Reasonable people can disagree on the 2, but FWIW, the 1 start Jennings has was against a top ten defense. I'm a little bothered that he didn't have more success throwing the ball, but he didn't need to with Hill going HAM.
I agree, Jennings has a ton of potential. It will be up to CC to maximize it which his track record so far with Mettenberger looks good.
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:09 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
We eliminated him when we signed another 5*
Am i mistaken or was his scholarship offer still on the table? I
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:10 pm to parkjas2001
LSU
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:10 pm to RB10
He was gracious enough when we took Allen over him. Shame LSU fans can't be as gracious to us for letting you have him, he should win you a lot of games. He fits that Jordan Jefferson/Perriloux/Russell Shepard dual threat mold that won so many games in the past
Posted on 1/30/14 at 3:10 pm to RB10
I think the offer was still good, he just would've never gotten playing time while Kyle Allen was there.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News