Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/26/13 at 8:49 pm to MIZ_STL
quote:
Probably the second one. Road wins against ranked teams, especially teams you've developed a bit of animosity towards, always seem to be pretty satisfying.
Yeah, I understand that and all, but the one this past year ... I dunno, felt like it was anti-climatic, ya know? Foregone conclusion that we were going to beat y'all ... but I get the idea that you are conveying. It is a legitimate suggestion.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 8:56 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
What is more satisfying for scrooster; beating Mizzou, or any piss that takes less than 15 minutes?
Do you think he squats on a bidet?
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:09 pm to kilo
quote:
Let's be real here. Mizzou has topped South Carolina's historical achievements
You keep saying this, but I don't understand why
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:15 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
You keep saying this, but I don't understand why
Well, I don't know what to tell you. I'm not posting bowl records, prestige of bowls played in, overall records, conference titles etc etc, again. Everyone knows this and has seen the facts.
How you choose to deal, or not deal, with it is on you brother.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:24 pm to roadhouse
quote:
Meant to direct that to scrooster...all you cocks look the same to me
lulz ... I'm sure you've seen quite a few up-close in your lifetime. Real close. Tasted them too I'd bet.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:26 pm to scrooster
quote:
Which SCAR victory over Mizzou was the most satisfying?
meh, it's Mizzou, I still feel like beating them is like beating one of the teams we're supposed to beat, so I'm satisfied when we win by 35 or 7 either way. Now losing to them would be disappointing, but that might not happen again for many years.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:29 pm to kilo
quote:
I'm not posting bowl records, prestige of bowls played in, overall records, conference titles
Probably because Missouri's history is not much better than USC's.
Missouri has more conference title with 15. 13 of those 15 were before 1960 though.
The 1960 Big 8 title was awarded retroactively because Kansas used an ineligible player and the 1969 title was split.
So it been just as many years since Missouri and South Carolina won a conference title. South Carolina was independent for 20 years during that time frame though.
Meanwhile, Missouri had a losing record for 12 straight years. 3 separate classes went from freshmen to seniors without a single winning season
Missouri has an all-winning percentage of 54. USC's is 51.
USC has 15 consensus all-america players. Missouri has 12.
Missouri has been to 9 more bowls than USC and won a little less than half. USC has won a third of their bowls
USC has a heisman trophy winner. Missouri does not.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:32 pm to Cockopotamus
Like I said, whatever and however you need to spin the numbers to deal with the facts is up to you.
No one looking at the two historical records is going to say Missouri isn't better than South Carolina.
This stuff wouldn't get brought up if a certain idiot in your fan base here would just chill.
No one looking at the two historical records is going to say Missouri isn't better than South Carolina.
This stuff wouldn't get brought up if a certain idiot in your fan base here would just chill.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:42 pm to kilo
quote:
No one looking at the two historical records is going to say Missouri isn't better than South Carolina.
If Missouri is better than its not by much. They seem pretty even to me
quote:
Like I said, whatever and however you need to spin the numbers to deal with the facts is up to you.
It doesn't take much. Simply identify when the conference championships were won and Missouri does not have an impressive history at all
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:47 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Missouri does not have an impressive history at al
No we really don't but it's noticeably better than South Carolina. Think about that for a while.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:48 pm to scrooster
TITCR: Trick question, neither resulted in am SECCG appearance?
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:50 pm to scrooster
quote:
lulz ... I'm sure you've seen quite a few up-close in your lifetime. Real close. Tasted them too I'd bet.
Pretty active imagination you have going on there...anything you feel like getting off your chest?
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:54 pm to roadhouse
Then again it only took Mizzou two years to get to the SECG.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:56 pm to kilo
Just because you keep saying something doesn' make it true.
This post was edited on 12/26/13 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:58 pm to Cockopotamus
Irony
Posted on 12/26/13 at 10:01 pm to kilo
Right. Not like I provide facts or anything. I just said my program was better than yours over and over again
Wait....
Wait....
Posted on 12/26/13 at 10:06 pm to kilo
quote:
Always a bridesmaid...
bridesmaid?
hell they're more like the retarded friend of a cousin who got a sympathy invitation to the wedding.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 10:06 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
You must mean 2010 when Oklahoma was rated #1. Let's see that was Missouri 36 - Oklahoma 27 your welcome
We beat #1 Alabama 35-20 2 weeks prior. So if it weren't for us you wouldn't have even had a shot at playing the #1 team. You can send your thank you card to Columbia, SC at your convenience.
Posted on 12/26/13 at 10:10 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:And y'all say Southerners are dumb.
your welcome
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News